Hello Dave, Thank you for the review, I've updated test according to your comments On 12/12/2014 03:55 AM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:06:42PM +0300, Alexander Tsvetkov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've prepared test for xfstests suite that runs some checks for ext4 >> mount option max_dir_size_kb introduced in Linux Kernel 3.7, could >> someone please look on it? >> >> Thanks, >> Alexander Tsvetkov >> From 21b1da618d0fcb4cd4666d10c41583274ed4eeed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Alexander Tsvetkov >> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:31:02 +0300 >> Subject: [PATCH] added test for max_dir_size_kb mount option >> >> --- >> tests/ext4/309 | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/ext4/309.out | 2 + >> tests/ext4/group | 3 +- >> 3 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100755 tests/ext4/309 >> create mode 100755 tests/ext4/309.out >> >> diff --git a/tests/ext4/309 b/tests/ext4/309 >> new file mode 100755 >> index 0000000..e2f4e43 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/tests/ext4/309 >> @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ >> +#! /bin/bash >> +# FS QA Test >> +# >> +# Test for mount option max_dir_size_kb >> +# >> +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> +# Copyright (c) 2014 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. >> +# >> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or >> +# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as >> +# published by the Free Software Foundation. >> +# >> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it would be useful, >> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> +# GNU General Public License for more details. >> +# >> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License >> +# along with this program; if not, write the Free Software Foundation, >> +# Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA >> +#----------------------------------------------------------------------- >> +# >> + >> +seq=`basename $0` >> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq >> +tmp=/tmp/$$ >> + >> +testdir=$SCRATCH_MNT/testdir >> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile > Do not call a file on the scratch device "testdir". That name has > specific meaning: it's the mount point for the test device. Using > the same variable name that differs only different syntax for > somethingon the scratch device is not a good idea. > > >> +sdir=`dirname $0` >> +sdir=`cd "$sdir"; pwd` > $here is already set to the current xfstests run location. > >> +echo "QA output created by $seq" >> +echo "Silence is golden" >> +rm -f $seqres.full >> + >> +status=1 # failure is the default! >> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 >> + >> +_cleanup() { >> + if [ ! -z SCRATCH_MNT ]; then >> + rm -fr $SCRATCH_MNT/test* >> + _scratch_unmount >> + fi >> +} > No. The harness will unmount the scratch device if it was mounted. > Unless you need to do specific cleanup fo rthe test, do not modify > the standard cleanup function. At minimum, it still needs to remove > all the $tmp files created during the test run. > > >> + >> +_filter_error() { >> + sed -n -e "s/.*\($1\).*/\"\1\"/p" >> +} > "_" prefix is reserved for library functions. > > Comments are generally required to explain the intent of regexs that > look like line noise. > > 8 space tabs. > >> + >> +_clear_testdir() { >> + dirs="$testdir *$" >> + for i in $dirs; do >> + rm -fr $i/* >> + done >> +} > I thought this was going to clean up the TEST_DIR, but as per above, > it's actually doing stuff to the scratch device. "remove_files()" > is good enough.... > >> + >> +# $1 - device >> +# $2 - options >> +_make_ext4fs() { >> + device=$1 >> + opts=$2 >> + umount $device 1>/dev/null 2>&1 >> + mkfs.ext4 $opts $device 1>/dev/null 2>&1 >> +} > _mkfs_dev > >> +# $1 - options >> +# $2 - mount point >> +_make_loopfs() { >> + lpf=$testfile >> + dd if=/dev/zero of=$lpf bs=4k count=256 1>/dev/null 2>&1 >> + loopdev=$(losetup -f) >> + losetup $loopdev $lpf >> + mkfs.ext4 -O ^dir_index,^has_journal $loopdev 1>/dev/null 2>&1 >> + mount -t ext4 $1 $loopdev $2 >> +} > no need to create a loop device. mount -o loop will do what you > want. Also, $MKFS_EXT4_PROG (or whatever the var is) shoul dbe used. > As should _mount. And 8 space tabs. > > >> + >> +# $1 - expected limit after items creation >> +# $2 - command to create item >> +# $3 - where to create (testdir by default) >> +_create_items() { >> + limit=$1 >> + create_cmd=$2 >> + dir=${3:-$testdir} >> + sync >> + echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches >> + MAX_INUM=$(((limit*1024*2)/24)) >> + for i in $(seq 0 $MAX_INUM); do >> + tmp_name=`mktemp -u` applied > We use $tmp as the location for temporary files in tests mktemp is used to fill test directory up to limit > >> + item=`basename $tmp_name` >> + if [ -e $dir/$item ]; then >> + continue >> + fi > Why? removed >> + create_cmd="$2 $dir/$item 2>$tmp.out 1>/dev/null" >> + eval "$create_cmd" >> + res=$? >> + if [ $res -ne 0 ]; then >> + _filter_error "No space left on device" < $tmp.out > $tmp.out2 >> + if [ -s $tmp.out2 ]; then >> + cat $tmp.out2 | tr -d '\n' >> $seqres.full >> + else >> + echo "FAIL! expected ENOSPC" | tee -a $seqres.full > _fail? this output is supposed to make a test failure, but as I see _fail is rather for test setup errors > >> + fi >> + break >> + fi > This all seems rather convoluted. You're creating a tmp file to > capture the error, then if you get an ENOSPC error you dump it to > the debug file, otherwise you dump an error message to main output > to cause the test to eventually fail? agree, I've simplified this part >> + done >> + size=$(stat -c %s $dir) >> + size=$((size/1024)) >> + if [ $size -gt $limit ]; then >> + echo "FAIL! expected dir size: $limit, actually: $size" | tee -a $seqres.full >> + fi >> + rm -f $tmp* >> +} >> + >> +# get standard environment, filters and checks >> +. ./common/rc >> + >> +# real QA test starts here >> + >> +_supported_fs ext4 >> +_supported_os Linux >> +_require_scratch > _require_loop > >> + >> +LIMIT1=8 >> +LIMIT2=16 >> + >> +_make_ext4fs $SCRATCH_DEV "-O ^dir_index,^filetype" > _scratch_mkfs -O ^dir_index,^filetype > applied > Cheers, > > Dave. Thanks, Alexander Tsvetkov