From: Till Wollenberg <till.wollenberg@uni-rostock.de>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Chip glitch for RSSI value ?
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:40:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548F0F0B.206@uni-rostock.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonvUOt=1hev7TXgRtf7Gh_omuU3qoNHiohNFX-e9oAZnA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi!
* On 12.12.2014 00:05 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> I _think_ that the only valid timestamp/rssi is is the final frame in
> an aggregate, not the intermediary frames. Did you correlate your
> checking with whether it was an aggregate or not, and if it's an
> aggregate, whether it's first, middle or final?
Thank you for pointing this out! I checked some of the frames without signal
information in my dataset. In all cases, these frames belong to a row of frames
with identical source and destination addresses, and more important, with
identical MAC timestamp.
However, in some cases the first frame of a row carries a signal value while all
others do not, and in some cases the very last frame carries a signal value
while all others do not.
There are also cases with a row of frames having identical MAC timestamps, but
no frame has a signal value.
It seems aggregated frames are de-aggregated somewhere on the chip or in the
driver before they appear on the monitor mode interface. Do you know if it is
possible (at least in theory) to pass A-MPDU and/or A-MSDU frames "as they are",
i.e. without de-aggregation, up to a monitor mode interface?
Best regards
Till
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-15 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-11 16:14 [ath9k-devel] Chip glitch for RSSI value ? Christophe Prévotaux
2014-12-11 18:19 ` Till Wollenberg
2014-12-11 23:05 ` Adrian Chadd
2014-12-15 16:40 ` Till Wollenberg [this message]
2014-12-16 0:59 ` Adrian Chadd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548F0F0B.206@uni-rostock.de \
--to=till.wollenberg@uni-rostock.de \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.