All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Ovechko <ovechko.spam@gmail.com>,
	qemu-discuss@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why do additional cores reduce performance?
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:26:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <548FFAAD.5040601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGwhzhG7NqVPn9cy+gLTMoWYLzpRhUmLqDdMUx_ceLQd723YLg@mail.gmail.com>



On 16/12/2014 00:40, Oleg Ovechko wrote:
> A. Host Windows, 6 cores (no HT, turbo boost off): 6:23 (+- 10 secs)
> B. Host Windows, 1 CPU core (other are turned off in BIOS): 7:13 (+-10 secs)
> C. Host 1 core, Guest Windows 1 core: 7:15 - same as B, no degradation
> D. Host 6 cores, Guest Windows 1 core: 7:57
> E. Host 6 cores, Guest Windows 4 cores: 8:17

What is your benchmark?

Windows sometimes has scalability problems due to the way it does
timing.  Try replacing "-cpu host" with "-no-hpet -cpu
host,hv_time,hv_vapic".

> 3. Also I am unsure about HT. When I specify "cores=2",

I suppose you mean "threads=2".

> is there any
> guaranty that whole core with both HT parts is passed to VM? Or it can be
> mix of two real cores with separate caches?

It will be a mix.  Do not specify HT in the guest, unless you have HT in
the host _and_ you are pinning the two threads of each guest core to the
two threads of a host core.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-16  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-15 23:40 Why do additional cores reduce performance? Oleg Ovechko
2014-12-16  9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-12-16 16:22   ` Oleg Ovechko
2014-12-16 16:31     ` Paolo Bonzini
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-12-15 23:33 Oleg Ovechko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=548FFAAD.5040601@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ovechko.spam@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-discuss@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.