From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/14] drm/exynos: few patches to enhance bridge chip support Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:31:41 +0100 Message-ID: <54914D7D.9060108@collabora.co.uk> References: <1416045309-13359-1-git-send-email-ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> <548ABAB6.6010200@collabora.co.uk> <3197445.qizQc0zeRb@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3197445.qizQc0zeRb@avalon> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Sean Paul , Daniel Vetter , Tomi Valkeinen , Ajay kumar , Kukjin Kim , Pannaga Bhushan Reddy Patel , Prashanth G , Ajay Kumar , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Hello Laurent and Tomi, On 12/16/2014 12:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Javier, >> Tomi and Laurent, >> >> You asked Ajay to change his series to use the video port and enpoints DT >> bindings instead of phandles, could you please review his latest version? >> >> I guess is now too late for 3.19 since we are in the middle of the merge >> window but it would be great if this series can at least made it to 3.20. > > I don't have time to review the series in details right now, but I'm happy > with the DT bindings, and have no big issue with the rest of the patches. I > don't really like the of_drm_find_bridge() concept introduced in 03/14 but I > won't nack it given lack of time to implement an alternative proposal. It's an > internal API, it can always be reworked later anyway. > Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at the DT bindings, then I guess that the series are finally ready to be merged? Ajay's series don't apply cleanly anymore because it has been a while since he posted it but he can rebase on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released and re-resend. Best regards, Javier From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:31:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V8 00/14] drm/exynos: few patches to enhance bridge chip support In-Reply-To: <3197445.qizQc0zeRb@avalon> References: <1416045309-13359-1-git-send-email-ajaykumar.rs@samsung.com> <548ABAB6.6010200@collabora.co.uk> <3197445.qizQc0zeRb@avalon> Message-ID: <54914D7D.9060108@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Laurent and Tomi, On 12/16/2014 12:37 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Javier, >> Tomi and Laurent, >> >> You asked Ajay to change his series to use the video port and enpoints DT >> bindings instead of phandles, could you please review his latest version? >> >> I guess is now too late for 3.19 since we are in the middle of the merge >> window but it would be great if this series can at least made it to 3.20. > > I don't have time to review the series in details right now, but I'm happy > with the DT bindings, and have no big issue with the rest of the patches. I > don't really like the of_drm_find_bridge() concept introduced in 03/14 but I > won't nack it given lack of time to implement an alternative proposal. It's an > internal API, it can always be reworked later anyway. > Thanks a lot for taking the time to look at the DT bindings, then I guess that the series are finally ready to be merged? Ajay's series don't apply cleanly anymore because it has been a while since he posted it but he can rebase on top of 3.19-rc1 once it is released and re-resend. Best regards, Javier