From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Grall Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] xmalloc: add support for checking the pool integrity Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:24:20 +0000 Message-ID: <549159D4.2040304@linaro.org> References: <1418758405-32200-1-git-send-email-mdontu@bitdefender.com> <549095E3.30202@citrix.com> <5490BAE4.5070108@linaro.org> <5490BFBD.7010809@citrix.com> <5490C22F.4020505@linaro.org> <549156C1.5000708@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <549156C1.5000708@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , =?UTF-8?B?TWloYWkgRG9uyJt1?= , xen-devel@lists.xen.org Cc: keir@xen.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, jbeulich@suse.com, tim@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 17/12/2014 10:11, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 16/12/14 23:37, Julien Grall wrote: > Introducing a new bugframe is precicely what I meant by "this doesn't > look hard". x86 currently has one more bugframe than arm, being > BUGFRAME_run_fn. And how do you pass the pointer of the function? As I said, ARM lacks of %c because of compiler issue. I'm out of idea on how to do simply on ARM. Let me know if you have a good solution. What I meant with introduce a new bug frame adding BUGFRAM_dump_stack. Regards, -- Julien Grall