From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] Integrated Unit Attention handling
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:54:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54916EDE.3000004@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5490501A.2020706@suse.de>
On 12/16/14 16:30, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 09:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Sounds like a good topic, altough I hope we'll see considerable
>> progress before LSF on this item..
>
> Full integration requires a change of the SCSI device model;
> currently struct scsi_device has a fixed type and inquiry data, so
> rescan is essentially a no-op.
> So the current model requires the complete removal of the device and
> a rescan on the host.
> Doing that from within the SCSI stack will open quite some
> interesting race conditions, let alone interesting userspace
> interactions.
> Alternatively we can change the model to allow for a change of the
> inquiry data, but that should be discussed.
>
> And then there is the Power-On/Reset handling, which probably would
> warrant a discussion on its own ...
Hello Hannes and Christoph,
If any of the topics raised by Hannes have not been resolved before the
LSF/MM starts I'm definitely interested in attending this discussion.
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-17 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-15 15:17 [LSF/MM TOPIC] Integrated Unit Attention handling Hannes Reinecke
2014-12-16 8:32 ` [Lsf-pc] " Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-16 15:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2014-12-17 9:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-12-17 11:54 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54916EDE.3000004@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.