From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Duncan Subject: Re: Clarification for Persistent Reservation + All Registrants Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 15:46:45 -0800 Message-ID: <549215E5.905@suse.com> References: <1418425163.10743.61.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> <1418428361.2270.13.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1418435595.10743.130.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> <1418456023.2351.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1418538447.5431.56.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1418538447.5431.56.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" , James Bottomley Cc: "t10@t10.org" , target-devel , Ilias Tsitsimpis , "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" , linux-scsi List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Sorry to come to this late, but I have one addition ... On 12/13/2014 10:27 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 08:33 +0100, James Bottomley wrote: >> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 17:53 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: >>> On Sat, 2014-12-13 at 00:52 +0100, James Bottomley wrote: >>>> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 14:59 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > lots of SNIP >> >> There is no reservation until a reserve command is issued. Once an all >> registrants reservation is issued, by any registered initator, all >> registered initators then become the reservation holder. >> > > So based on the above, the issue raised by Ilias where once the original > All Registrants reservation is released, the other registrations lose > their 'implicit' reservation until someone does another RESERVE + > type=All Registrants is a bug. U belive your target Nicholas is working correctly. See that other thread for more details. > > Working on a proper bugfix for this now. > > Thanks James! > > --nab > -- Lee Duncan