All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Wright <anthony@overnetdata.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Panic doing BLKDISCARD on a raid 5 array on linux 3.17.3
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:21:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5492AABE.4050508@overnetdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141218162858.47310158@notabene.brown>

On 18/12/2014 05:28, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:00:13 +0000 Anthony Wright <anthony@overnetdata.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I've hit a panic bug on stock linux 3.17.3 (which includes the recent
>> commit on BLKDISCARD in md/raid5.c) running in Dom0 under Xen 4.1.0 that
>> I've isolated to a BLKDISCARD system call within mkfs.ext3 and only
>> happens on a raid 5 array (it doesn't happen on a raid 1 array).
>>
>> The system it happens on is remote and I don't have physical access to
>> it, but the system administrator there is fairly helpful. We're in the
>> process of commissioning the system which needs to be done tomorrow
>> (thursday), so I've only got 24 hours in which I can run any tests you
>> may want. If necessary I can arrange remote access, but it's a little
>> complex.
>>
>> We have 3 512GB SSDs on the system, all with a GPT partition table and
>> the same partition layout. All the partitions have optimal alignment
>> according to parted. One of the partitions on each SSD is assembled into
>> a raid 1 array, another partition is assembled into a raid 5 array. Each
>> array is the used as the only physical volume in a LVM volume group. I
>> then create a logical volume on each array and format the logical volume
>> with mkfs.ext3. I ran mkfs.ext3 in verbose mode and also ran strace on
>> it in a separate session (though it was over a network) so it's possible
>> I lost the last few packets of data.
>>
>> /dev/Test/Test - 400MB LV on raid 1
>> /dev/Master/Test - 400MB LV on raid 5
>>
>> A) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v /dev/Test/Test - succeeds
>> B) mkfs.ext3 -v /dev/Test/Test - succeeds
>> C) mkfs.ext3 -E nodiscard -v /dev/Master/Test - succeeds
>> D) mkfs.ext3 -v /dev/Master/Test - panics
>>
>> mkfs.ext3 output from (B)
>> -------------------------
>> mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
>> fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small'
>> Discarding device blocks: done                           Discard
>> succeeded and will return 0s - skipping inode table wipe
>> Filesystem label=
>> OS type: Linux
>> Block size=1024 (log=0)
>> Fragment size=1024 (log=0)
>> Stride=4 blocks, Stripe width=4 blocks
>> 51200 inodes, 204800 blocks
>> 10240 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user
>> First data block=1
>> Maximum filesystem blocks=67371008
>> 25 block groups
>> 8192 blocks per group, 8192 fragments per group
>> 2048 inodes per group
>> Superblock backups stored on blocks:
>>     8193, 24577, 40961, 57345, 73729
>>
>> Allocating group tables: done                           Writing inode
>> tables: done                           Creating journal (4096 blocks): done
>> Writing superblocks and filesystem accounting information: done
>>
>> strace output from (B) around the BLKDISCARD
>> --------------------------------------------
>> gettimeofday({1418806647, 890754}, NULL) = 0
>> gettimeofday({1418806647, 890814}, NULL) = 0
>> ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010})   = 0
>> write(1, "Discarding device blocks: ", 26) = 26
>> write(1, "  1024/204800", 13)           = 13
>> write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13) = 13
>> ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {100000, 3000000010}) = 0
>> write(1, "             ", 13)           = 13
>> write(1, "\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10\10", 13) = 13
>> write(1, "done                            "..., 33) = 33
>> write(1, "Discard succeeded and will retur"..., 65) = 65
>>
>> mkfs.ext3 output from (D)
>> -------------------------
>> mke2fs 1.42.9 (28-Dec-2013)
>> fs_types for mke2fs.conf resolution: 'ext3', 'small'
>> <Panic>
>>
>> strace output from (D) around the BLKDISCARD
>> --------------------------------------------
>> gettimeofday({1418809706, 244197}, NULL) = 0
>> gettimeofday({1418809706, 244259}, NULL) = 0
>> ioctl(3, BLKDISCARD, {0, 3000000010}
>> <Panic>
>>
>> I have a photograph of the panic output from a previous session which
>> includes raid5d and blk_finish_plug in the stack trace, unfortunately I
>> don't have the top part of the panic and vger won't accept the
>> attachment. I also have a photograph of the console output from the
>> crash at (D), but in this case it outputs to the console every 180 seconds:
>>
>> INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 1}
>> sending NMI to all CPUs:
>> xen: vector 0x2 is not implemented
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Anthony Wright
> Presumably you have deliberately enabled DISCARD support by setting the
>   raid456.devices_handle_discard_safely
>
> modules parameters?  Otherwise the DISCARD should be a no-op.
I haven't touched the raid456.devices_handle_discard_safely setting, I
only learnt about it when I discovered your patch while I investigated
the crash. I'm presuming it's the default value, but if there's a way to
confirm that please let me know.
> It is very hard to deduce anything without the full Oops.  Do you have access
> to another machine on the same subnet?  If so you could enable netconsole and
> capture the full oops from the other machines (all console messages are sent
> via UDP at a very low level).
I've got netconsole working, but it doesn't always panic and it takes a
while to get the system reset. Below is the output I got from the most
recent crash:

[63207.177400] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
0000001e00008000

Anthony.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-18 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-17 12:00 Panic doing BLKDISCARD on a raid 5 array on linux 3.17.3 Anthony Wright
2014-12-18  5:28 ` NeilBrown
2014-12-18 10:21   ` Anthony Wright [this message]
2014-12-18 10:58   ` Anthony Wright
2014-12-18 18:05     ` Chris Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5492AABE.4050508@overnetdata.com \
    --to=anthony@overnetdata.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.