Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/2] Test case for cpupools

[Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>]

On 12/18/2014 02:38 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Just the fact that we are not doing anything to smoke test cpupools, while I
> think we should. :-)
>
> This add something quite basic, but it's, IMO, already representative one
> typically does with cpupools. We can add more pCPU related tricks (removing,
> adding, etc), or we can add more domains and move them around more, of course.
> If anyone has any suggestion about operations that should really be part of
> Osstest's runs, let me know and I'll include them.
>
> As it is right now, the test is super quick, to the point that I considered
> whether it wouldn't have been better to add some similar cpupool operations in
> one of the existing jobs. I ended up deciding for having a separate job,
> because this is, after all, a rather specific operation, and a different enough
> thing from basic VM lifecycle, so I think it deserves its own job.
>
> Thanks and Regards, Dario

Thanks for doing this!


Juergen

>
> ---
>
> Dario Faggioli (2):
>        ts-cpupools: new test script
>        Testing cpupools: recipe for it and job definition
>
>
>   make-flight |   11 +++++
>   sg-run-job  |    6 +++
>   ts-cpupools |  124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 141 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100755 ts-cpupools
>
> --
> <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
> Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>