From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chen, Tiejun" Subject: Re: [v8][PATCH 04/17] update the existing hypercall to support XEN_DOMCTL_set_rdm Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 09:03:37 +0800 Message-ID: <54937969.6090805@intel.com> References: <548090BA020000780004CCE6@mail.emea.novell.com> <54854F2D.6060204@intel.com> <54857491020000780004D9D6@mail.emea.novell.com> <5486A8FB.4080402@intel.com> <5486BE99020000780004DF8A@mail.emea.novell.com> <20141209101111.GA75319@deinos.phlegethon.org> <20141210111213.GB64596@deinos.phlegethon.org> <20141211130946.GD53811@deinos.phlegethon.org> <20141218161325.GA75015@deinos.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141218161325.GA75015@deinos.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tim Deegan , "Tian, Kevin" Cc: "wei.liu2@citrix.com" , "ian.campbell@citrix.com" , "stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com" , "ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Jan Beulich , "Zhang, Yang Z" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 2014/12/19 0:13, Tim Deegan wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > At 14:09 +0100 on 11 Dec (1418303386), Tim Deegan wrote: >> At 02:03 +0000 on 11 Dec (1418259797), Tian, Kevin wrote: >>>> From: Tim Deegan [mailto:tim@xen.org] >>>> Now since the code's not going to be in 4.5 anyway, it should be >>>> possible to _develop_ it in this manner, possibly in a private branch, >>>> even if the early stages aren't getting applied immediately. We >>>> should be able to set up an rmrr branch on the public servers if that >>>> helps. But again, that relies on having a design worked out in >>>> advance that both developers and maintainers are (within reason) >>>> committed to. >>> >>> that's a good suggestion. We'll send out a design review today, and then >>> based on discussion we can see whether making sense to do such >>> incremental way. >> >> Sounds good! > > I haven't seen this design doc yet -- if I missed it can someone point > me to it? > No. Its still reviewed/discussed internally but it will come soon. Tiejun