From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sylwester Nawrocki Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos7: Add clocks for MSCL block Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:21:58 +0100 Message-ID: <549450A6.9020205@samsung.com> References: <1418801617-7593-1-git-send-email-tony.kn@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:27935 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbaLSQWE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:22:04 -0500 Received: from eucpsbgm2.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by mailout3.w1.samsung.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Nov 17 2011)) with ESMTP id <0NGU00HR28BG7OB0@mailout3.w1.samsung.com> for linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:26:04 +0000 (GMT) In-reply-to: <1418801617-7593-1-git-send-email-tony.kn@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Tony K Nadackal Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, tomasz.figa@gmail.com, mturquette@linaro.org, kgene@kernel.org, a.kesavan@samsung.com, bhushan.r@samsung.com Hi, On 17/12/14 08:33, Tony K Nadackal wrote: > Add clock support for the MSCL block for Exynos7. > > Signed-off-by: Tony K Nadackal > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt | 1 + > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos7.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++ > include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos7-clk.h | 40 ++++++- > 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt > index 6d3d5f8..d0e048c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Required Properties for Clock Controller: > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-peris" > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-fsys0" > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-fsys1" > + - "samsung,exynos7-clock-mscl" I can't see anything controversial in the patch, but I've got some doubts regarding the compatible string. Is there a SoC named just "Exynos7"? If not, what are exact SoC names the "samsung,exynos7-clock-mscl" compatible is supposed to cover ? It would be good to list in this file the exact SoCs names this binding applies to, unless there is indeed Exynos7 SoC. -- Thanks, Sylwester From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 17:21:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] clk: samsung: exynos7: Add clocks for MSCL block In-Reply-To: <1418801617-7593-1-git-send-email-tony.kn@samsung.com> References: <1418801617-7593-1-git-send-email-tony.kn@samsung.com> Message-ID: <549450A6.9020205@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 17/12/14 08:33, Tony K Nadackal wrote: > Add clock support for the MSCL block for Exynos7. > > Signed-off-by: Tony K Nadackal > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt | 1 + > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos7.c | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++ > include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos7-clk.h | 40 ++++++- > 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt > index 6d3d5f8..d0e048c 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/exynos7-clock.txt > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ Required Properties for Clock Controller: > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-peris" > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-fsys0" > - "samsung,exynos7-clock-fsys1" > + - "samsung,exynos7-clock-mscl" I can't see anything controversial in the patch, but I've got some doubts regarding the compatible string. Is there a SoC named just "Exynos7"? If not, what are exact SoC names the "samsung,exynos7-clock-mscl" compatible is supposed to cover ? It would be good to list in this file the exact SoCs names this binding applies to, unless there is indeed Exynos7 SoC. -- Thanks, Sylwester