Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Monday 15 July 2013 12:02:59 Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Joe MacDonald
> 
> <Joe.MacDonald@windriver.com> wrote:
> > [[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH 0/3] Add mosh and dependencies] On 13.07.13 (Sat 
15:47) Paul Eggleton wrote:
> >> Add a recipe for mosh, and for dependencies migrate libio-pty-perl from
> >> OE-Classic and bring in protobuf from meta-virtualization.
> >> 
> >> I considered putting this in meta-networking, however meta-virtualization
> >> will still need protobuf and it already depends on meta-oe, and
> >> officially meta-networking does not depend on meta-oe so splitting these
> >> would not really work with the current layer dependencies.
> > 
> > That's not strictly true anymore, actually.  It was my intent and I
> > think there's value in it, but CRDA (already in meta-networking) depends
> > on python-m2crypto (in meta-oe).  I discovered it in my world build a
> > few weeks ago and hadn't yet managed to get round to seeing if there was
> > a clean way to separate the two.
> > 
> > I absolutely don't want the stated intent that meta-networking be
> > standalone be a barrier to adding packages to it that clearly belong to
> > it.
> > 
> > That's my way of saying I've no objection right now to including this in
> > meta-net.
> 
> I agree; maybe we could add those inside meta-oe subdir? so people can
> opt in enable them or not.

Sorry Otavio, what are you suggesting exactly?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre