From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34037) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y32bg-0005cf-Mx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:01:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y32bc-0000OT-82 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:01:04 -0500 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:3383) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y32bb-0000Ng-Hy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 08:01:00 -0500 Message-ID: <549815F1.6040501@huawei.com> Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 21:00:33 +0800 From: ChenLiang MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1416830152-524-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <20141210023333.GB27208@grmbl.mre> <20141210100939.GE6189@grmbl.mre> <20141216150128.GG5467@work-vm> In-Reply-To: <20141216150128.GG5467@work-vm> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND for 2.3 0/6] xbzrle: optimize the xbzrle List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Cc: weidong.huang@huawei.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, Amit Shah , pbonzini@redhat.com On 2014/12/16 23:01, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > * Amit Shah (amit.shah@redhat.com) wrote: >> On (Wed) 10 Dec 2014 [08:03:33], Amit Shah wrote: >>> On (Mon) 24 Nov 2014 [19:55:46], arei.gonglei@huawei.com wrote: >>>> From: ChenLiang >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> This set of patches rebase on >>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg04956.html, >>>> >>>> Those patches have been reviewed before half a year. >>>> For now I rebase them with the master branch. >>>> Hope those optimization can be merged in Qemu-2.3, Thanks! >>> >>> Applied to my tree. >> >> Sorry, spoke to soon; I've held this series for the moment due to >> ongoing review. > > Why don't we split this series; 1 and 2 seem to be the least > controversial; then we can think about 3-5 separately if we're > still uncomfortable. > > Dave > -- > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK > > . > It sounds good. The 1 and 2 is the core of patches. Best regards ChenLiang