From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 Development Update (RC4) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 15:10:12 +0000 Message-ID: <549985D4.1040509@citrix.com> References: <20141216161352.504FA124EF2@laptop.dumpdata.com> <54906F2C.8030800@citrix.com> <20141216204900.GB11551@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com> <54944210.6050402@citrix.com> <20141219181447.GB7162@laptop.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141219181447.GB7162@laptop.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Xen-devel List List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/12/2014 18:14, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:19:44PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> >> There will be another full nightly test happening tonight (based on c/s >> 7e88c23 "libxl: Tell qemu to use raw format when using a tapdisk"), and >> some stress and scale tests if time allows. > Yeey! thank you for getting to this! Results are in from the latest nighties, and looking good. No identifiable differences between Xen 4.4 and 4.5 There are also no identified differences in the scale and performance tests. ~Andrew