From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Rich Felker <dalias-8zAoT0mYgF4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
"linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect documentation for tgkill syscall when tgid==-1
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:31:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54998AC2.70202@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141219020553.GA23392-C3MtFaGISjmo6RMmaWD+6Sb1p8zYI1N1@public.gmane.org>
Rich,
On 12/19/2014 03:05 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
> The man page for tgkill claims:
>
> "If tgid is specified as -1, tgkill() is equivalent to tkill()."
>
> However, the kernel source contains:
>
> /* This is only valid for single tasks */
> if (pid <= 0 || tgid <= 0)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> and I confirmed that passing -1 results in EINVAL. This discrepency
> should be fixed in the documentation.
Sigh. Text along those lines has been there since the pages added
in 2003.
> Since there's therefore no way to achieve the same behavior as tkill
> using the tgkill syscall, I'd also like to request a removal of the
> text claiming tkill is obsolete. tgkill does not solve the race
> condition it claims to solve (this is documented to some extent in the
> relevant git commits to musl libc, and I intend to write more on the
> issue later) nor is it needed to solve the race (tkill works just as
> well if used correctly).
I guess the relevant bug here is
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12889
right?
I'm a little puzzled. In that bug report, you say:
(The tgkill syscall was designed to eliminate a similar race
condition in tkill, but it only succeeded in eliminating races
where the tid gets reused in a different process, and does not
help if the same tid gets assigned to a new thread in the
same process.)
Is it not the case that tgkill() solves *some* of the race conditions
that tkill() is vulnerable to (i.e., TID recycled in a different
process), and therefore is an improvement on tkill() (i.e., renders
it obsolete)?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-23 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20141219020553.GA23392@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
[not found] ` <20141219020553.GA23392-C3MtFaGISjmo6RMmaWD+6Sb1p8zYI1N1@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-23 15:31 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) [this message]
[not found] ` <54998AC2.70202-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-23 17:14 ` Incorrect documentation for tgkill syscall when tgid==-1 Rich Felker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54998AC2.70202@gmail.com \
--to=mtk.manpages-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dalias-8zAoT0mYgF4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.