From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 10:18:52 -0800
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Support for txbf (beam-forming)?
In-Reply-To: <549B01F8.40600@candelatech.com>
References: <549B01F8.40600@candelatech.com>
Message-ID: <549B038C.6070207@candelatech.com>
List-Id: <ath9k-devel.lists.ath9k.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org

On 12/24/2014 10:12 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> A quick grep of ath9k shows no support for txbf, but
> there were some RFC patches from back in 2010 about this.
>
> Anyone know why this never made it upstream, or did it make
> it upstream in a different guise?

I thought this sounded familiar...seems I asked a similar question
a few years ago and got a response...so nevermind unless someone
has done more work on this in the meantime.

Thanks,
Ben

>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>


-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com