From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Xen 4.5 Development Update (RC4) Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 13:34:07 +0000 Message-ID: <549D63CF.3000202@citrix.com> References: <20141216161352.504FA124EF2@laptop.dumpdata.com> <54906F2C.8030800@citrix.com> <20141216204900.GB11551@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com> <54944210.6050402@citrix.com> <20141219181447.GB7162@laptop.dumpdata.com> <549985D4.1040509@citrix.com> <1796025636.20141226132026@eikelenboom.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1796025636.20141226132026@eikelenboom.it> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Sander Eikelenboom Cc: Xen-devel List List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 26/12/2014 12:20, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: > Tuesday, December 23, 2014, 4:10:12 PM, you wrote: > > >> On 19/12/2014 18:14, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 03:19:44PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>>> There will be another full nightly test happening tonight (based on c/s >>>> 7e88c23 "libxl: Tell qemu to use raw format when using a tapdisk"), and >>>> some stress and scale tests if time allows. >>> Yeey! thank you for getting to this! >> Results are in from the latest nighties, and looking good. No >> identifiable differences between Xen 4.4 and 4.5 >> There are also no identified differences in the scale and performance tests. >> ~Andrew > Hi Andrew, > > Was this from a debug=y or debug=n build for both versions ? Both for both sets of tests. XenServer, as of 6.5, contains both a debug and non-debug hypervisor, built from identical source. In trunk, the debug hypervisor is used by default. Tests such as performance tests explicitly switch to the non-debug hypervisor as part of their setup. ~Andrew