From: Alex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] socket: Allow external sockets to use socket syscalls
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2014 14:26:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <549DB660.8040606@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <549D2E51.3040200@redhat.com>
Hello Jason,
Thanks again for your comments.
On 12/26/14 4:45 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> @@ -388,6 +388,7 @@ struct file *sock_alloc_file(struct socket *sock, int flags, const char *dname)
>> sock->file = file;
>> file->f_flags = O_RDWR | (flags & O_NONBLOCK);
>> file->private_data = sock;
>> + file->private_data_is_socket = true;
>
> This is only safe if all user of sock_alloc_file() have full support for
> each method in proto_ops.
This doesn't change anything in the invocation of the syscalls, as every
file allocated through this path already passes the "is_socket" test due
to the (sadly missing here)
file = alloc_file(..., &socket_file_ops)
above, so this makes things no less safe than they were.
Of course we also need to implement these proto_ops for the tun device
in the subsequent patch to make it work.
>> return file;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(sock_alloc_file);
>> @@ -411,7 +412,7 @@ static int sock_map_fd(struct socket *sock, int flags)
>>
>> struct socket *sock_from_file(struct file *file, int *err)
>> {
>> - if (file->f_op == &socket_file_ops)
>> + if (file->private_data_is_socket)
>> return file->private_data; /* set in sock_map_fd */
>>
>> *err = -ENOTSOCK;
>
> Not sure it's the best method, how about a dedicated f_op to do this?
So like a get_socket operation? That would simplify this a lot,
certainly (we wouldn't need to move private_data around in the tun driver).
Thanks,
--
Alex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-26 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-26 6:50 [PATCH net-next 0/2] tun: support socket system calls Alex Gartrell
2014-12-26 6:50 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] socket: Allow external sockets to use socket syscalls Alex Gartrell
2014-12-26 9:45 ` Jason Wang
2014-12-26 19:26 ` Alex Gartrell [this message]
2014-12-26 19:56 ` Al Viro
2014-12-26 19:59 ` Alex Gartrell
2014-12-26 6:50 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] tun: enable socket system calls Alex Gartrell
2014-12-26 9:43 ` Jason Wang
2014-12-26 19:16 ` Alex Gartrell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=549DB660.8040606@fb.com \
--to=agartrell@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.