From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tanya Brokhman Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:15:51 +0200 Message-ID: <54A16217.1060006@codeaurora.org> References: <1415023112-21704-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org> <54A0C70D.7040706@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:34336 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570AbaL2OP5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Dec 2014 09:15:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54A0C70D.7040706@huawei.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: hujianyang Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, open list , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Artem Bityutskiy , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse Hi Hu, On 12/29/2014 5:14 AM, hujianyang wrote: > On 2014/11/3 21:58, Tanya Brokhman wrote: >> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to >> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices. >> Add device number to all ubi layer message types. >> >> The R/O block driver messages were replaced by pr_* since >> ubi_device structure is not used by it. >> >> Amended a bit by Artem. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman >> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy >> --- >> Changes from V1: > > > Hi Artem and Tanya, > > Do you think the similar effort is worth to be done on ubifs-level? We already did this for UBIFS as well and have been working with this patch for some time now. Its in our todo to share it, just got pulled into some urgent staff unfortunately. Thanks, Tanya Brokhman -- Qualcomm Israel, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Y5b7J-0007JM-F9 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:16:17 +0000 Message-ID: <54A16217.1060006@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:15:51 +0200 From: Tanya Brokhman MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hujianyang Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities References: <1415023112-21704-1-git-send-email-tlinder@codeaurora.org> <54A0C70D.7040706@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <54A0C70D.7040706@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dedekind1@gmail.com, Richard Weinberger , Artem Bityutskiy , open list , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Brian Norris , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Hu, On 12/29/2014 5:14 AM, hujianyang wrote: > On 2014/11/3 21:58, Tanya Brokhman wrote: >> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to >> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices. >> Add device number to all ubi layer message types. >> >> The R/O block driver messages were replaced by pr_* since >> ubi_device structure is not used by it. >> >> Amended a bit by Artem. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman >> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy >> --- >> Changes from V1: > > > Hi Artem and Tanya, > > Do you think the similar effort is worth to be done on ubifs-level? We already did this for UBIFS as well and have been working with this patch for some time now. Its in our todo to share it, just got pulled into some urgent staff unfortunately. Thanks, Tanya Brokhman -- Qualcomm Israel, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project