From: Phillip Susi <psusi@ubuntu.com>
To: ashford@whisperpc.com,
Jose Manuel Perez Bethencourt <jmperezbeth@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
"sys.syphus" <syssyphus@gmail.com>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I need to P. are we almost there yet?
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 21:45:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A3633C.3040609@ubuntu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40b56c60ddd4801295a92c4b11d5c08e.squirrel@webmail.wanet.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On 12/30/2014 06:17 PM, ashford@whisperpc.com wrote:
> I believe that someone who understands the code in depth (and that
> may also be one of the people above) determine exactly how BTRFS
> implements RAID-10.
I am such a person. I had a similar question a year or two ago (
specifically about raid10 ) so I both experimented and read the code
myself to find out. I was disappointed to find that it won't do
raid10 on 3 disks since the chunk metadata describes raid10 as a
stripe layered on top of a mirror.
Jose's point was also a good one though; one chunk may decide to
mirror disks A and B, so a failure of A and C it could recover from,
but a different chunk could choose to mirror on disks A and C, so that
chunk would be lost if A and C fail. It would probably be nice if the
chunk allocator tried to be more deterministic about that.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUo2M8AAoJENRVrw2cjl5RihoH/1ulWpEK6lPaYhBSBbmWQyGu
obJZBTbeMgBAfO9VMq9X2laUfmEprwYi8FuKnCwVgA1KyftFsaJngckqMoTtpwdI
IXx2X2++MjZBkFBUFRhGlSQcbDgeB/RbBx+Vtxi2dNq3/WgZyHRfIJT1moRrxY0V
UTH1kI7JsWg4blpdm+xW4o7UKds7JKHr5Th1PUH9SmJOdsBe2efIFQyC7hyuSQs0
gBUQzxmo3HcRzBtJwJjKRICU16VBN0NW7w3m/y6K1yIlkGi4U7MZgzMSUJw/BiMT
tGX48AhBH3D3R2sjmF2aO5suPaHEVYoZuqhKevKZfTGS7izSYA74LqrGHkq5QBk=
=ESya
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-31 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-29 18:56 I need to P. are we almost there yet? sys.syphus
2014-12-29 19:00 ` sys.syphus
2014-12-29 19:04 ` Hugo Mills
2014-12-29 20:25 ` sys.syphus
2014-12-29 21:50 ` Hugo Mills
2014-12-29 21:16 ` Chris Murphy
2014-12-30 0:20 ` ashford
[not found] ` <CALBWd85UsSih24RhwpmDeMjuMWCKj9dGeuZes5POj6qEFkiz2w@mail.gmail.com>
2014-12-30 17:09 ` Fwd: " Jose Manuel Perez Bethencourt
2014-12-30 21:44 ` Phillip Susi
2014-12-30 23:17 ` ashford
2014-12-31 2:45 ` Phillip Susi [this message]
2014-12-31 17:27 ` ashford
2014-12-31 23:38 ` Phillip Susi
2015-01-01 1:26 ` Chris Samuel
2015-01-01 20:12 ` Roger Binns
2015-01-02 3:47 ` Duncan
2015-01-02 13:42 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-01-02 17:45 ` Brendan Hide
2015-01-02 19:41 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2014-12-29 21:13 ` Chris Murphy
2015-01-03 11:34 ` Bob Marley
2015-01-03 13:11 ` Duncan
2015-01-03 18:53 ` Bob Marley
2015-01-03 19:03 ` sys.syphus
2015-01-03 18:55 ` sys.syphus
2015-01-04 3:22 ` Duncan
2015-01-04 3:54 ` Hugo Mills
2015-01-03 21:58 ` Roman Mamedov
2015-01-04 3:24 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A3633C.3040609@ubuntu.com \
--to=psusi@ubuntu.com \
--cc=ashford@whisperpc.com \
--cc=jmperezbeth@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=syssyphus@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.