From: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
To: sjust@redhat.com, Josh Durgin <jdurgin@redhat.com>
Cc: Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Higher OSD disk util due to RBD snapshots from Dumpling to Firefly
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 19:43:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A6E6C7.9050901@profihost.ag> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+4uBUZziztmmx+FJdNJ=Tjva3muaJofCo-ijk4S1V9PcpXBxg@mail.gmail.com>
Am 02.01.2015 um 17:49 schrieb Samuel Just:
> Odd, sounds like it might be rbd client side?
> -Sam
That one was already on list:
https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org/msg19091.html
Sadly there was no result as it was unseen for 2 weeks and i didn't had
the test equipment anymore.
Greets,
Stefan
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> Am 31.12.2014 um 17:21 schrieb Wido den Hollander:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Last week I upgraded a 250 OSD cluster from Dumpling 0.67.10 to Firefly
>>> 0.80.7 and after the upgrade there was a severe performance drop on the
>>> cluster.
>>>
>>> It started raining slow requests after the upgrade and most of them
>>> included a 'snapc' in the request.
>>>
>>> That lead me to investigate the RBD snapshots and I found that a rogue
>>> process had created ~1800 snapshots spread out over 200 volumes.
>>>
>>> One image even had 181 snapshots!
>>>
>>> As the snapshots weren't used I removed them all and after the snapshots
>>> were removed the performance of the cluster came back to normal level
>>> again.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering what changed between Dumpling and Firefly which caused
>>> this? I saw OSDs spiking to 100% disk util constantly under Firefly
>>> where this didn't happen with Dumpling.
>>>
>>> Did something change in the way OSDs handle RBD snapshots which causes
>>> them to create more disk I/O?
>>
>>
>> I saw the same and addionally a slowdown in librbd too, that's why i'm still
>> on dumpling and won't upgrade until hammer.
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-02 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-31 16:21 Higher OSD disk util due to RBD snapshots from Dumpling to Firefly Wido den Hollander
2015-01-01 9:30 ` Stefan Priebe
2015-01-02 16:49 ` Samuel Just
2015-01-02 18:43 ` Stefan Priebe [this message]
2015-01-02 19:02 ` Samuel Just
2015-01-07 16:51 ` Dan van der Ster
2015-01-08 7:55 ` Wido den Hollander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54A6E6C7.9050901@profihost.ag \
--to=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jdurgin@redhat.com \
--cc=sjust@redhat.com \
--cc=wido@42on.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.