All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@intel.com>
Cc: lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Drop odr_bits from kmx61_samp_freq_table
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 10:55:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54A91C27.5030905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54A5516D.5050209@gmx.de>

On 01/01/15 13:53, Hartmut Knaack wrote:
> Daniel Baluta schrieb am 23.12.2014 um 14:22:
>> odr_bits values are between 0 and 11, so we can use the index
>> in kmx61_samp_freq_table instead of odr_bits structure member.
> Basically looking good, but I would feel more comfortable to check
> against the boundaries of the table. Please see inline.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c b/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c
>> index eb3900e..98369eb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c
>> @@ -169,19 +169,18 @@ u16 kmx61_uscale_table[] = {9582, 19163, 38326};
>>  static const struct {
>>  	int val;
>>  	int val2;
>> -	u8 odr_bits;
>> -} kmx61_samp_freq_table[] = { {12, 500000, 0x00},
>> -			{25, 0, 0x01},
>> -			{50, 0, 0x02},
>> -			{100, 0, 0x03},
>> -			{200, 0, 0x04},
>> -			{400, 0, 0x05},
>> -			{800, 0, 0x06},
>> -			{1600, 0, 0x07},
>> -			{0, 781000, 0x08},
>> -			{1, 563000, 0x09},
>> -			{3, 125000, 0x0A},
>> -			{6, 250000, 0x0B} };
>> +} kmx61_samp_freq_table[] = { {12, 500000},
>> +			{25, 0},
>> +			{50, 0},
>> +			{100, 0},
>> +			{200, 0},
>> +			{400, 0},
>> +			{800, 0},
>> +			{1600, 0},
>> +			{0, 781000},
>> +			{1, 563000},
>> +			{3, 125000},
>> +			{6, 250000} };
>>  
>>  static const struct {
>>  	int val;
>> @@ -302,24 +301,10 @@ static int kmx61_convert_freq_to_bit(int val, int val2)
>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_samp_freq_table); i++)
>>  		if (val == kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val &&
>>  		    val2 == kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val2)
>> -			return kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].odr_bits;
>> -	return -EINVAL;
>> -}
>> -
>> -static int kmx61_convert_bit_to_freq(u8 odr_bits, int *val, int *val2)
>> -{
>> -	int i;
>> -
>> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_samp_freq_table); i++)
>> -		if (odr_bits == kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].odr_bits) {
>> -			*val = kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val;
>> -			*val2 = kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val2;
>> -			return 0;
>> -		}
>> +			return i;
>>  	return -EINVAL;
>>  }
>>  
>> -
>>  static int kmx61_convert_wake_up_odr_to_bit(int val, int val2)
>>  {
>>  	int i;
>> @@ -478,7 +463,7 @@ static int kmx61_set_odr(struct kmx61_data *data, int val, int val2, u8 device)
>>  
>>  static int kmx61_get_odr(struct kmx61_data *data, int *val, int *val2,
>>  			 u8 device)
>> -{	int i;
>> +{
>>  	u8 lodr_bits;
>>  
>>  	if (device & KMX61_ACC)
>> @@ -490,13 +475,13 @@ static int kmx61_get_odr(struct kmx61_data *data, int *val, int *val2,
>>  	else
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  
>> -	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_samp_freq_table); i++)
>> -		if (lodr_bits == kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].odr_bits) {
>> -			*val = kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val;
>> -			*val2 = kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val2;
>> -			return 0;
>> -		}
>> -	return -EINVAL;
>> +	if (lodr_bits > 0xB)
> Since we use it as an index, I regard it safer to check against
> ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_samp_freq_table) rather than a fix value.
Makes sense to me as well - though obviously ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_samp_freq_table) is
0xC (12) rather than 0xB (11) so you'll need a minus 1

I'll leave this one for a new spin.
> 
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	*val = kmx61_samp_freq_table[lodr_bits].val;
>> +	*val2 = kmx61_samp_freq_table[lodr_bits].val2;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int kmx61_set_range(struct kmx61_data *data, u8 range)
>> @@ -580,8 +565,11 @@ static int kmx61_chip_init(struct kmx61_data *data)
>>  	}
>>  	data->odr_bits = ret;
>>  
>> -	/* set output data rate for wake up (motion detection) function */
>> -	ret = kmx61_convert_bit_to_freq(data->odr_bits, &val, &val2);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * set output data rate for wake up (motion detection) function
>> +	 * to match data rate for accelerometer sampling
>> +	 */
>> +	ret = kmx61_get_odr(data, &val, &val2, KMX61_ACC);
>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>  		return ret;
>>  
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-04 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-23 13:22 [PATCH 00/10] iio: KMX61 fixes Daniel Baluta
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Save odr_bits for later use Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:45   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:41     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Don't ignore kmx61_set_power_state errors Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:45   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:42     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Enhance error handling Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:47   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:45     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-01-05  8:57       ` Daniel Baluta
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Fixup parameters alignment Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:47   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:47     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Drop unused device parameter Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:49   ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Use false instead of 0 for ev_enable_state Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:50   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:49     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Fix device initialization when setting trigger state Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:51   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:51     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Remove unnecessary REG_INS1 read Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:51   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:54     ` Jonathan Cameron
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Drop odr_bits from kmx61_samp_freq_table Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:53   ` Hartmut Knaack
2015-01-04 10:55     ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2015-01-04 11:19       ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-23 13:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] iio: imu: kmx61: Use correct base when reading data Daniel Baluta
2015-01-01 13:54   ` Hartmut Knaack
2014-12-26  9:57 ` [PATCH 00/10] iio: KMX61 fixes Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54A91C27.5030905@kernel.org \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.baluta@intel.com \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.