From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 5488FE007BA; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:11:37 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_URI_ONLY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [135.245.210.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.5 BODY_URI_ONLY Message body is only a URI in one line of text or for * an image Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-01.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598BAE002F9 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.5.2.64]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id DA18D5873ECE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 19:11:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by us70tusmtp2.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t06JBSvo028835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 14:11:29 -0500 Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id t06JBSr6003719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:11:28 -0600 Received: from [135.222.138.133] (Ed-PC.mh.lucent.com [135.222.138.133]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id t06JBRa2021661 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:11:27 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54AC324F.1010301@alcatel-lucent.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 14:06:55 -0500 From: Ed Sutter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" References: <54AC1D12.5040603@alcatel-lucent.com> In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10 Subject: Re: webrtc question X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 19:11:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Otavio thanks for responding, > Hello Ed, > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Ed Sutter wrote: >> I apologize if this is the wrong list for this question, but I'm about to >> embark on a iMX6 -based multimedia project that will be greatly helped by webRTC >> functionality. >> >> Still getting up to speed on this, but it will not be Android, and it will >> need to run outside the scope of a browser. I believe this is referred to as >> "native webRTC". >> >> Has anything been done with iMX6-linux regarding webRTC? >> Does hardware acceleration support for VP8 encode/decode work on iMX6? >> Any pointers would be appreciated. > It all depends on what you intend to do and the tooling you want to > use. From your description it seems that the webRTC will be the > 'communication channel' and the processing of the packages will be a > second step (audio / video / whatever). For VP8 it does work, as it is > supported in Chromium. > Yea, the first step is to make my iMX6 based device be compatible with the communication channels (and data formats, i.e. VP8/opus/etc..) used/supported by webrtc. The difference will be that (in certain modes) there is no user on the device; it will be headless and autonomous, so I need to be able to feed media to and extract media from the underlying webrtc base platform on the iMX6. Does Chromium provide any non-browser type of hooks into webrtc down below? Thanks,