From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: Nominations for Xen 4.5 stable tree maintainer. Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:08:12 +0000 Message-ID: <54AD21AC.4030203@citrix.com> References: <20150106161542.GB9765@l.oracle.com> <1420630002.18631.46.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Lars Kurth , Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , "Keir (Xen.org)" , "Tim (Xen.org)" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 07/01/15 11:59, Lars Kurth wrote: > > On 07/01/2015 11:26, "Ian Campbell" wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 11:15 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Per http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Maintenance_Releases: >>> "Each stable branch has a maintainer who is nominated/volunteers >>> according to the Maintainer Election >>> process described in the project governance document >>> [http://www.xenproject.org/governance.html]. >>> This will resulting in the MAINTAINERS file in the relevant branch >>> being patched to include the maintainer." >>> >>> For the past year or so Jan Beulich has been the stable tree maintainer. >>> >>> Since Xen 4.5 has branched that opens up a new stable tree and we can >>> also >>> stop maintaining Xen 4.3 stable tree. >>> >>> The nominations are open - please volunteer yourself. In case nobody >>> volunteers I can also take the role. >>> >>> I ask folks to finish voting/nominating by Jan 14th so that when Xen >>> 4.5 comes >>> out we have an viable stable tree maintainer. >> I'm not sure how voting is supposed to proceed with multiple nominations >> (and with the deadline for nominations apparently being the same as for >> voting), > Actually, it is questionable whether there are multiple nominations. > Andrew said "If Jan wants a break, I would be happy to volunteer." Quite - I am happy for Jan to continue in this role. I would also agree that having the same person doing all stable trees would be far more efficient than any split alternative. ~Andrew