From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Testing the next giant release Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:03:43 +0100 Message-ID: <54ADBB4F.40705@dachary.org> References: <54AD3C8B.4030705@dachary.org> <54ADB2FA.9030204@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tACS71K5DFhpslx0TBi8TrkoLBFOXxo1O" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:35087 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752149AbbAGXDq (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:03:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tamil Muthamizhan , Yuri Weinstein Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --tACS71K5DFhpslx0TBi8TrkoLBFOXxo1O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Yuri & Tamil ! One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?branch=3Dgiant does not show= a run of rbd or rgw. They would be useful to figure out what kind of err= ors I should expect. Are past results archived elsewhere by any chance ? On 07/01/2015 23:53, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: > yes, just those suites will do Loic. >=20 > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein > wrote: >> Loic, >> >> I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on >> whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs. >> >> Thx >> YuriW >> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:= >>> >>> >>> On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>>> hi Loic, >>>> >>>> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. >>>> maybe you can try that to make sure things work. >>> >>> Are these the suites I should try: >>> >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw >>> >>> any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.e.= all os versions etc.) >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>>> >>>> once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teutholo= gy for a more elaborate run. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Tamil >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary > wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Tamil, >>>> >>>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>>> >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>>> >>>> into >>>> >>>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710= f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>>> >>>> and successfully ran make check on it >>>> >>>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=3Dgiant-backpo= rts >>>> >>>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If= I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are mo= st relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the int= egration branch somewhere ? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Tamil >>> >>> -- >>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --tACS71K5DFhpslx0TBi8TrkoLBFOXxo1O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlStu08ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21mugCeMWIUf0SRz+IGQorRHOGa32q1 fuQAoMAazy2mUZiaE3lgIsq6V8633AJW =BIvO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tACS71K5DFhpslx0TBi8TrkoLBFOXxo1O--