From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Testing the next giant release Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:40:43 +0100 Message-ID: <54ADC3FB.1050201@dachary.org> References: <54AD3C8B.4030705@dachary.org> <54ADB2FA.9030204@dachary.org> <54ADBB4F.40705@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C4Ol8rHOOs0pQMFh4AgIF33LaQdLa8ECO" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:35105 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755166AbbAGXkr (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2015 18:40:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --C4Ol8rHOOs0pQMFh4AgIF33LaQdLa8ECO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Great, thanks, I did not know about this one :-) On 08/01/2015 00:29, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Look for them in new Octo lab - http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/ >=20 > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> >> Thanks Yuri & Tamil ! >> >> One last question : http://pulpito.ceph.com/?branch=3Dgiant does not s= how a run of rbd or rgw. They would be useful to figure out what kind of = errors I should expect. Are past results archived elsewhere by any chance= ? >> >> >> On 07/01/2015 23:53, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>> yes, just those suites will do Loic. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Yuri Weinstein >>> wrote: >>>> Loic, >>>> >>>> I think if you run those on bare metals (not vps) they will run on >>>> whatever machines are available in the octo or sepia labs. >>>> >>>> Thx >>>> YuriW >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Loic Dachary wrot= e: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 07/01/2015 23:20, Tamil Muthamizhan wrote: >>>>>> hi Loic, >>>>>> >>>>>> we have a suite to perform smoke tests for rados/rbd/rgw. >>>>>> maybe you can try that to make sure things work. >>>>> >>>>> Are these the suites I should try: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rados >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rbd >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/master/suites/rgw >>>>> >>>>> any specific settings or just all of three without restrictions (i.= e. all os versions etc.) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> once it looks good, we can have them scheduled to run using teutho= logy for a more elaborate run. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Tamil >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Loic Dachary > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tamil, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>>>>> >>>>>> into >>>>>> >>>>>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d67= 10f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>>>>> >>>>>> and successfully ran make check on it >>>>>> >>>>>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=3Dgiant-back= ports >>>>>> >>>>>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. = If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are = most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the i= ntegration branch somewhere ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Tamil >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --C4Ol8rHOOs0pQMFh4AgIF33LaQdLa8ECO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlStw/sACgkQ8dLMyEl6F21IpwCcC0OKTbNv9j+nC7drAXHQxEoz pFAAn0rxsMiBu2j0wnHp1+HuxLNlkwQN =H0Wk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C4Ol8rHOOs0pQMFh4AgIF33LaQdLa8ECO--