From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: Testing the next giant release Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 10:39:50 +0100 Message-ID: <54AE5066.2000102@dachary.org> References: <54AD3C8B.4030705@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lqGeOltbMbBqXnQItPuh52aAOiOAUUV1T" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:35291 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752640AbbAHJjx (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2015 04:39:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54AD3C8B.4030705@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Tamil Muthamizhan Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --lqGeOltbMbBqXnQItPuh52aAOiOAUUV1T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The giant-backports branch has been built by gitbuilders tonight http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/#= origin/giant-backports etc. and I scheduled a rbd suite with =2E/virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rbd= --suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email loic@dac= hary.org --owner loic@dachary.org --ceph giant-backports which shows at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-test= ing-basic-vps/ To be continued ! On 07/01/2015 15:02, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Tamil, >=20 > I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >=20 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >=20 > into=20 >=20 > http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454= ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >=20 > and successfully ran make check on it >=20 > http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=3Dgiant-backports >=20 > If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to= do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most rele= vant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integratio= n branch somewhere ? >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --lqGeOltbMbBqXnQItPuh52aAOiOAUUV1T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlSuUGYACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22TOgCgjbwOCsmcOxujpUT6T5Pe5pIT QfQAn3rPNJPJCZPMPrr8n2cuUK1oDdM4 =er4z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lqGeOltbMbBqXnQItPuh52aAOiOAUUV1T--