From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47453) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9Adu-0004ms-7H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 05:48:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9Adp-000116-86 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 05:48:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]:64959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9Adp-000107-1A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 05:48:37 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n12so1859815wgh.8 for ; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 02:48:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <54AE607E.4050709@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 11:48:30 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1418957987-28511-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1418957987-28511-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND v2 0/3] vl: smp_parse sanity checks List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Andrew Jones , Peter Lieven On 19/12/2014 03:59, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > From the original series sent by Andrew, only patch 1/3 was kept. Patch 2/3 > from v1 was replaced by a safer fix. Patch 3/3 was removed because it generates > a warning even on the most common use-case ("-smp " without any extra > options). > > Andrew Jones (1): > vl: fix max_cpus check > > Eduardo Habkost (2): > vl: Avoid unnecessary 'if' nesting > vl: Don't silently change topology when all -smp options were set > > vl.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > Eduardo, I forgot the status of these patches. Should I just apply them? If so, can you take care of documenting the changes in the 2.3 release notes? Paolo