From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Y9dxA-0001kt-CI for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:06:32 +0000 Received: from [192.168.100.236] (unknown [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37E5740C28A for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:06:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B01892.4080609@candelatech.com> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:06:10 -0800 From: Ben Greear MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Question on CE_DESC_FLAGS_META_DATA field. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k While poking in the CE code, I notice this below. Shouldn't the CE_DESC_FLAGS_META_DATA_LSB be 2, and if not, can someone explain why? [greearb@ben-dt2 ath10k]$ grep CE_DESC_FLAGS_META_DATA *h ce.h:#define CE_DESC_FLAGS_META_DATA_MASK 0xFFFC ce.h:#define CE_DESC_FLAGS_META_DATA_LSB 3 and this from core.h: #define MS(_v, _f) (((_v) & _f##_MASK) >> _f##_LSB) Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k