From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-id: <54B39472.4000303@samsung.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:31:30 +0100 From: Karol Wrona MIME-version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Cameron , Lars-Peter Clausen , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack , Peter Meerwald , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Kyungmin Park , Karol Wrona Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: Add no-triggered buffer helper functions References: <1420735227-21091-1-git-send-email-k.wrona@samsung.com> <1420735227-21091-2-git-send-email-k.wrona@samsung.com> <54B108A9.7080307@metafoo.de> <54B16DD3.3030505@kernel.org> In-reply-to: <54B16DD3.3030505@kernel.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-ID: On 01/10/2015 07:22 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 10/01/15 11:10, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >> On 01/08/2015 05:40 PM, Karol Wrona wrote: >>> These ones helps to create and manage iio_kfifo buffer when >>> no-triggered buffer is used. >> [...] >>> +int iio_notriggered_buffer_setup(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, >>> + const struct iio_buffer_setup_ops *setup_ops) >>> + >>> +{ >>> + int ret; >>> + struct iio_buffer *buffer; >>> + >>> + buffer = iio_kfifo_allocate(); >>> + if (!buffer) >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> + >>> + iio_device_attach_buffer(indio_dev, buffer); >>> + >>> + indio_dev->setup_ops = setup_ops; >>> + >>> + ret = iio_buffer_register(indio_dev, indio_dev->channels, >>> + indio_dev->num_channels); >>> + if (ret) >>> + iio_kfifo_free(buffer); >>> + >> >> We recently got rid of having to manually call iio_buffer_register() and iio_buffer_unregister(). This is now done by the IIO core. See http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/commit/?h=togreg&id=3e1b6c95b990c93f4aa3b17e9f66221e2fa44bee >> >> I don't think we actually need these non-triggered helper functions anymore. It basically just boils down to iio_kfifo_allocate() and iio_device_attach_buffer(). >> > Even if they are still worthwhile, I'd just put them in the core code rather > than having the additional module. Too trivial for it to make sense > in a utility module. > > I'm inclined to agree with Lars that the recent changes reduce the argument for > having these to marginal at best. Bad luck for crossing with those! > > Jonathan > > J >> - Lars No problem with dropping that. I prefer to be done this way too as now cleanup wrapper has no sense at all. Thanks Karol >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >