From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/evtchn: Alter free_xen_event_channel()
 to take a domain rather than vcpu
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:10:46 +0000
Message-ID: <54B39DA6.7020508@citrix.com>
References: <1421056003-18872-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<54B3AAD50200007800053914@mail.emea.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <54B3AAD50200007800053914@mail.emea.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 12/01/15 10:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.01.15 at 10:46, <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> The resource behind an event channel is domain centric rather than vcpu
>> centric, and free_xen_event_channel() only follows the vcpu's domain 
>> pointer.
> I wonder whether for symmetry alloc_unbound_xen_event_channel()
> shouldn't then also take a [struct domain *, unsigned int vcpu_id]
> pair instead of a struct vcpu *.

Sounds like a good idea - I will do that for v2.

~Andrew