From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59960) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAcIJ-000351-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:32:24 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAcIG-0000Da-4w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:32:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]:56450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAcIF-0000DO-UH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 05:32:20 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z12so18418699wgg.13 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 02:32:19 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <54B3A2AE.2080900@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:32:14 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1420798626-11428-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> <20150112095257.GA9902@fam-t430.nay.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150112095257.GA9902@fam-t430.nay.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/26] Block patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Fam Zheng , Stefan Hajnoczi , Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers On 12/01/2015 10:52, Fam Zheng wrote: > On Sat, 01/10 19:10, Peter Maydell wrote: >> On 10 January 2015 at 19:05, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 9 January 2015 at 10:16, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >>>> This pull request depends on the previous block pull request which has not been >>>> merged yet. It was sent on Monday, 5th of January (Message-id: >>>> <1420458696-1885-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>). >>>> >>>> The following changes since commit 3bd54e576f40f1d5bf45b4828c7316efd76a4db6: >>>> >>>> migration/block: fix pending() return value (2015-01-05 11:34:52 +0000) >>>> >>>> are available in the git repository at: >>>> >>>> git://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/block-pull-request >>>> >>>> for you to fetch changes up to 4cba4284918145de66e27959725559f8aaf764ef: >>>> >>>> NVMe: Set correct VS Value for 1.1 Compliant Controllers (2015-01-09 10:12:23 +0000) >>> >>> I'm confused. You say this pull depends on the other one, but >>> the emails give the same tag name for both, so I can't pull >>> the other one first. (In fact, if not for this one failing I >>> would have applied it under the assumption that it *was* the >>> previous pullreq...) >>> >>> In any case, this one fails 'make check': >> >> Failed also and differently on my 32 bit ARM board, though that >> may just be because I run this set with V=1; last part >> of the log below. Looks like something is trying to run >> qemu-system-arm without specifying a machine to use... >> > > Ouch! This is something that proves really hard to do. > > Stefan, please drop the make check-block series in next revision. No need to drop the bug fixes. One can just drop patch 11 ("tests/Makefile: Add check-block to make check on Linux"). Paolo