From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH] evtchn: simplify sending of notifications Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:52:40 +0000 Message-ID: <54B3A778.8020500@citrix.com> References: <54B39A7C020000780005382E@mail.emea.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YAcc2-0005r5-13 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:52:46 +0000 In-Reply-To: <54B39A7C020000780005382E@mail.emea.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , xen-devel Cc: Ian Campbell , Ian Jackson , Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/01/15 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote: > The trivial wrapper evtchn_set_pending() is pretty pointless, as it > only serves to invoke another wrapper evtchn_port_set_pending(). In > turn, the latter is kind of inconsistent with its siblings in that is > takes a struct vcpu * rather than a struct domain * - adjusting this > allows for more efficient code in the majority of cases. Reviewed-by: David Vrabel David