Re: Testing the next giant release

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3248 bytes --]

Hi Yuri,

I analyzed the errors from the rbd run at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ and summarized my findings in the description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501

It would be great if you could let me know if these look familiar. They all seem to relate to something that's not from the backports, except for http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10513 because it looks new.

Cheers

On 08/01/2015 17:10, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Tamil,
> 
> The test completed with a number of failures. I compared them with the latest giant / rbd run (which is on the red hat private lab). The number of failure is comparable (40 failed out of 102 january 6th 2015). However the failures are mostly different and I'm not sure what to do next.
> 
> http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-01-06_02:00:01-rbd-giant-distro-basic-magna/ shows
> 
> Command failed on magna094 with status 1: 'sudo yum install ceph-radosgw-0.87 -y' 
> 
> (a number of times)
> 
> Command failed on magna065 with status 1: 'adjust-ulimits ceph-coverage /home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/coverage daemon-helper term qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -nographic -m 4096 -drive file=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/base.client.0.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio -cdrom /home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/client.0.iso -fsdev local,id=log,path=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/qemu/client.0,security_model=none -device virtio-9p-pci,fsdev=log,mount_tag=test_log -drive file=rbd:rbd/client.0.0:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough -drive file=rbd:rbd/client.0.1:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough'
> 
> (a few times).
> 
> On 08/01/2015 10:39, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The giant-backports branch has been built by gitbuilders tonight
>>
>> http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/#origin/giant-backports
>> etc.
>>
>> and I scheduled a rbd suite with
>>
>> ./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rbd --suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email loic@dachary.org --owner loic@dachary.org  --ceph giant-backports
>>
>> which shows at
>>
>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/
>>
>> To be continued !
>>
>> On 07/01/2015 15:02, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>> Hi Tamil,
>>>
>>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289
>>>
>>> into 
>>>
>>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2
>>>
>>> and successfully ran make check on it
>>>
>>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports
>>>
>>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch somewhere ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]