All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carsten Aulbert <Carsten.Aulbert@aei.mpg.de>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: extremely slow file creation/deletion after xfs ran full
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 17:09:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B3F19D.6030307@aei.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150112155206.GD25944@bfoster.bfoster>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]

Hi Brian

On 01/12/2015 04:52 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
> I can't see any symbols associated with the perf output. I suspect
> because I'm not running on your kernel. It might be better to run 'perf
> report -g' and copy/paste the stack trace for some of the larger
> consumers.
> 

Sorry, I rarely need to use perf and of course forgot that the
intermediate output it tightly coupled to the running kernel. Attaching
the output of perf report -g here.
> 
> Sounds good. FWIW, something like the following should tell us how many
> free inodes are available in each ag, and thus whether we have to search
> for free inodes in existing records rather than allocate new ones:
> 
> for i in $(seq 0 15); do
> 	xfs_db -c "agi $i" -c "p freecount" <dev>
> done
> 
Another metric :)

freecount = 53795884
freecount = 251
freecount = 45
freecount = 381
freecount = 11009
freecount = 6748
freecount = 663
freecount = 595
freecount = 693
freecount = 9089
freecount = 37122
freecount = 2657
freecount = 60497
freecount = 1790275
freecount = 54544

That looks... not really uniform to me.

Cheers

Carsten



[-- Attachment #2: touch.stack.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 3498 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: rm.stack.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 702 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-12 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-12  8:36 extremely slow file creation/deletion after xfs ran full Carsten Aulbert
2015-01-12 12:44 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-12 13:30 ` Carsten Aulbert
2015-01-12 15:52   ` Brian Foster
2015-01-12 16:09     ` Carsten Aulbert [this message]
2015-01-12 16:37       ` Brian Foster
2015-01-12 17:33         ` Carsten Aulbert
2015-01-13 20:06           ` Stan Hoeppner
2015-01-13 20:13             ` Carsten Aulbert
2015-01-13 20:43               ` Stan Hoeppner
2015-01-14  6:07                 ` Carsten Aulbert
2015-01-13 20:33           ` Dave Chinner
2015-01-14  6:12             ` Carsten Aulbert
2015-01-16 15:35               ` Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B3F19D.6030307@aei.mpg.de \
    --to=carsten.aulbert@aei.mpg.de \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.