From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Durgin Subject: Re: ceph_test_librbd_fsx fails with thrasher Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:59:05 -0800 Message-ID: <54B3FD59.6070808@inktank.com> References: <54B3D9B0.2050906@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:37028 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbbALQ7K (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:59:10 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id eu11so32976246pac.8 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 08:59:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54B3D9B0.2050906@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: Ceph Development On 01/12/2015 06:26 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Josh, > > While looking at errors from a giant (plus backports) run of the RBD suite, I stumbled upon: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10513 > > and the error is unclear (at least to me ;-). Would you have an idea ? For information the backports included are all the pull requests mentionned at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501. Thanks for organizing these Loic! There's no trace of the actual error in the teuthology or ceph client logs. Looking at the syslogs, this and several other failures from that run were from running out of memory. This happened with and without caching, so I suspect these tests may simply need more memory in their current configuration, since osds are sharing it too, and they use much more with thrashing. Josh