All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kamezawa Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"\"Ishimatsu, Yasuaki/石松 靖章\"" <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Tang Chen" <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com" <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: update numa affinity info at node hotplug
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:47:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B5D8B4.7010708@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150113152224.GA2976@htj.dyndns.org>

On 01/13/2015 11:22 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:19:09PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> The Mapping of the *online* cpus to nodes is already maintained by numa code.
>>
>> What the workqueue needs is a special Mapping:
>> 	The Mapping of the *possible* cpus to nodes
>>
>> But this mapping (if the numa code maintain it) is a trouble:
>> 	"possible" implies the mapping is stable/constant/immutable, it is hard to
>> 	ensure it in the numa code.
>>
>> if mutability of this mapping is acceptable, we just move 20~40 LOC
>> of code from workqueue to numa code, all the other complexities
>> about it are still in workqueue.c.
> 
> Make numa code maintain the mapping to the best of its knowledge and
> invoke notification callbacks when it changes.  

The best of its knowledge is the physical onlined nodes and CPUs.
The cpu_present_mask can represent this knowledge. But it lacks of
the per-node cpu_present_mask and the notification callbacks.

> Even if that involves slightly more code, that's the right thing to do at this point.

Right, but in currently, the workqueue will be the only user, and I don't known
asking who to do it, so I may keep it in the workqueue.c.

> This puts the logic which is complicated by the fact that the mapping may
> change where it's caused not some random unrelated place.  


> It'd be
> awesome if somebody more familiar with the numa side can chime in and
> explain why this mapping change can't be avoided.

I'm also looking for someone answer it.

> 
> Thanks.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-16 16:36 [PATCH 0/2] workqueue: fix a bug when numa mapping is changed v4 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: update numa affinity info at node hotplug Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-17  1:36   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-17  3:22     ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-17  4:56       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-25 20:11         ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-13  7:19           ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-13 15:22             ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-14  2:47               ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2015-01-14  8:54                 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq_numa bug Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 1/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: reset pool->node and unhash the pool when the node is offline Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 2/2 shit_A] workqueue: update wq_numa when cpu_present_mask changed Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 2/3 shit_B] workqueue: remove wq_numa_possible_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14  8:54                   ` [RFC PATCH 3/3 shit_B] workqueue: directly update attrs of pools when cpu hot[un]plug Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-16  5:22                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq_numa bug Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2015-01-16  8:04                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-23  6:13                   ` Izumi, Taku
2015-01-23  8:18                     ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-14 13:57                 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: update numa affinity info at node hotplug Tejun Heo
2015-01-15  1:23                   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: update cpumask at CPU_ONLINE if necessary Kamezawa Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B5D8B4.7010708@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.