From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: edma: Correct header file usage Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:21:03 +0530 Message-ID: <54B63C07.9010301@ti.com> References: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F4526167D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:51:14 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org To: Peter Ujfalusi , Mark Brown , linux@arm.linux.org.uk, arnd@arndb.de, vinod.koul@intel.com, khilman@deeprootsystems.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, chris@printf.net, Liam Girdwood , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Thursday 27 November 2014 04:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > The linux/platform_data/edma.h file was used for API definition as well, which > is not correct since the header should only contain platform data related > structures, defines, etc. I would like to queue this series through ARM-SoC for v3.20 with Mark's and Ulf's acks added. I know its not the complete clean-up everyone wanted to see but I also know Peter working on doing the complete clean-up as well. So we are firmly on the path to removing arch/arm/common/edma.c. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: edma: Correct header file usage Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:21:03 +0530 Message-ID: <54B63C07.9010301@ti.com> References: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, chris@printf.net, Liam Girdwood , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Peter Ujfalusi , Mark Brown , , , , Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org List-Id: linux-spi.vger.kernel.org On Thursday 27 November 2014 04:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > The linux/platform_data/edma.h file was used for API definition as well, which > is not correct since the header should only contain platform data related > structures, defines, etc. I would like to queue this series through ARM-SoC for v3.20 with Mark's and Ulf's acks added. I know its not the complete clean-up everyone wanted to see but I also know Peter working on doing the complete clean-up as well. So we are firmly on the path to removing arch/arm/common/edma.c. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:21:03 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: edma: Correct header file usage In-Reply-To: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> References: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Message-ID: <54B63C07.9010301@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thursday 27 November 2014 04:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > The linux/platform_data/edma.h file was used for API definition as well, which > is not correct since the header should only contain platform data related > structures, defines, etc. I would like to queue this series through ARM-SoC for v3.20 with Mark's and Ulf's acks added. I know its not the complete clean-up everyone wanted to see but I also know Peter working on doing the complete clean-up as well. So we are firmly on the path to removing arch/arm/common/edma.c. Thanks, Sekhar From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753943AbbANJwH (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:52:07 -0500 Received: from comal.ext.ti.com ([198.47.26.152]:36395 "EHLO comal.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753870AbbANJwE (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 04:52:04 -0500 Message-ID: <54B63C07.9010301@ti.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:21:03 +0530 From: Sekhar Nori User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Ujfalusi , Mark Brown , , , , CC: Liam Girdwood , , , , , , , , , Tony Lindgren , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: edma: Correct header file usage References: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> In-Reply-To: <1417084891-17990-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 27 November 2014 04:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi, > > The linux/platform_data/edma.h file was used for API definition as well, which > is not correct since the header should only contain platform data related > structures, defines, etc. I would like to queue this series through ARM-SoC for v3.20 with Mark's and Ulf's acks added. I know its not the complete clean-up everyone wanted to see but I also know Peter working on doing the complete clean-up as well. So we are firmly on the path to removing arch/arm/common/edma.c. Thanks, Sekhar