All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 33399: regressions - FAIL
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:22:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B65181.1030805@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B658880200007800054B4C@mail.emea.novell.com>

On 14/01/15 10:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 14.01.15 at 11:33, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> flight 33399 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33399/ 
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>>  test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64  8 guest-start            fail REGR. vs. 33112
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64  7 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 33112
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 7 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 33112
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 7 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 33112
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64  7 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 33112
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64  7 windows-install          fail REGR. vs. 33112
>>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64  7 windows-install    fail REGR. vs. 33112
> Most if not all of these are falling over 07a6aa869b ("x86/HVM:
> make hvm_efer_valid() honor guest features"), which I'm therefore
> going to revert as I don't have time right now to investigate (and
> I also don't immediately see why I wouldn't have seen this in my
> own testing).

I have several debug patches I have used in the past to identify the
before, after and the bit(s) Xen objects to with these validation
routines.  I was looking to find some tuits to get them suitable for
upstream, and perhaps this is a good enough reason.

~Andrew

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14 10:33 [xen-unstable test] 33399: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2015-01-14 10:52 ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-14 11:22   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2015-01-14 11:37     ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-14 12:07       ` Andrew Cooper
2015-01-15 14:14       ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-15 14:53         ` Jan Beulich
2015-01-15 15:06           ` Andrew Cooper
2015-01-15 15:10             ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B65181.1030805@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.