From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ken Dreyer Subject: Re: RGW's apache and mod_fastcgi Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 18:40:21 -0700 Message-ID: <54B71A85.8080807@redhat.com> References: <54AC3429.2030104@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51133 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750826AbbAOBkX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:40:23 -0500 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0F1eNaQ025647 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:40:23 -0500 Received: from mbp.ktdreyer.com (vpn-55-158.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.55.158]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0F1eMos011130 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 20:40:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <54AC3429.2030104@redhat.com> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On 01/06/2015 12:14 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > There's the question of Unix Domain Sockets support. In Yehuda's testing > with mod_proxy_fcgi, Unix Domain Sockets (UDS) provide a lot better > performance in comparison to TCP sockets. Apache's UDS support shipped > in Apache upstream version 2.4.9, but both RHEL and Ubuntu have versions > older than this. RHEL 7 has httpd 2.4.6, and Trusty has 2.4.7. My > intention is to request that the Ubuntu apache2 maintainers to backport > UDS to their Trusty package, similarly to what Red Hat intends to ship > in RHEL 7.1. To follow up on this: Apache's mod_proxy UDS support is now present in the httpd-2.4.6-19 package in RHEL and CentOS. I've opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1411030 to request the Ubuntu package maintainers backport UDS support for Trusty's Apache 2.4.7 package. - Ken