From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: dm + blk-mq soft lockup complaint Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 09:11:56 +0100 Message-ID: <54B7764C.9000402@sandisk.com> References: <54B40E8A.6010005@kernel.dk> <20150112191138.GC21518@redhat.com> <20150112202113.GA23234@redhat.com> <54B50F9D.2040000@sandisk.com> <20150113141746.GA30411@redhat.com> <54B52B73.7040807@sandisk.com> <20150113162052.GA30837@redhat.com> <54B633DC.4090806@sandisk.com> <20150114185926.GB6012@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150114185926.GB6012@redhat.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Christoph Hellwig , device-mapper development , Jun'ichi Nomura , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: dm-devel.ids On 01/14/15 20:00, Mike Snitzer wrote: > IB aside, I haven't been following along close enough on scsi-mq > developments, but does a regular iscsi initiator have support for > scsi-mq? I'd like to validate scsi-mq devices with the dm-mpath > changes. Hello Mike, scsi-mq support for the iSCSI initiator is being considered but has not yet been implemented. For more information, see also Sagi Grimberg, [LSF/MM TOPIC] iSCSI MQ adoption via MCS discussion, linux-scsi mailing list, January 7, 2015 (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.scsi/98199). Bart.