From: Wido den Hollander <wido@42on.com>
To: ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: 'Immutable bit' on pools to prevent deletion
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:46:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B7D2D6.4020503@42on.com> (raw)
Hi,
Although the userland tools like 'ceph' and 'rados' have a safeguard
against fat fingers when it comes to removing a pool there is no such
safeguard when using native librados.
The danger still exists that by accident you remove a pool which is then
completely gone, no way to restore it.
This is still something I find quite dangerous, so I was thinking about
a additional 'Immutable bit' which could be set on a pool before
rados_pool_delete() allows this pool to be removed.
Is it a sane thing to look at 'features' which pools could have? Other
features which might be set on a pool:
- Read Only (all write operations return -EPERM)
- Delete Protected
It's just that looking at a 20TB RBD pool and thinking that just one API
call could remove this pool make me a bit scared.
Am I the only one or is this something worth looking in to?
--
Wido den Hollander
42on B.V.
Ceph trainer and consultant
Phone: +31 (0)20 700 9902
Skype: contact42on
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-15 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 14:46 Wido den Hollander [this message]
2015-01-15 15:39 ` 'Immutable bit' on pools to prevent deletion Dan Van Der Ster
2015-01-15 15:52 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-15 15:45 ` Mike Dawson
2015-01-15 15:58 ` Yehuda Sadeh
2015-01-15 17:24 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 17:44 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 17:55 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-01-15 18:07 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 18:45 ` Gregory Farnum
2015-01-15 19:02 ` John Spray
2015-01-15 19:07 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-15 22:02 ` John Spray
2015-01-16 7:55 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-16 9:50 ` Sebastien Han
2015-01-16 10:55 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-16 14:46 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-19 19:32 ` Mykola Golub
2015-01-19 20:28 ` Sage Weil
[not found] ` <597309080.14312.1421421468640.open-xchange@websrv>
2015-01-16 20:45 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-17 2:31 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-01-17 13:11 ` Wido den Hollander
2015-01-17 16:24 ` Sage Weil
2015-01-17 19:09 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-01-17 23:28 ` David Zafman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B7D2D6.4020503@42on.com \
--to=wido@42on.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.