From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: upcoming release giant v0.87.1 : leads feedback needed Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:12:12 +0100 Message-ID: <54B7E6DC.8010905@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4xLF5XfOlBDFwkbesbdqIKP5BeMh7DFdA" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:41082 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754248AbbAOQMP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:12:15 -0500 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0273842AF2 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:12:12 +0100 (CET) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --4xLF5XfOlBDFwkbesbdqIKP5BeMh7DFdA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ceph, The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch was tested w= ith the rgw, rados and rbd suites. The results of each suite have been an= alyzed and summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501. The next s= teps are either: a) Yehuda for rgw, Josh for rbd and Sam for rados all agree that the erro= rs are unrelated to the backports b) The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch is given = to QE for final tests and merge into giant OR a) At least of the lead thinks more work is needed to stabilize the giant= branch b) A new set of tests will be run and analyzed after adding/removing one = or more backports to/from the https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-bac= kports branch The description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501 shows a detailed = list of all commits / issues that are in the giant backport branch. To ge= t a global view of what the next giant point release will be, the descrip= tion also includes the commits that have already been merged in the giant= branch. The list of pull requests that are candidate for inclusion in th= e giant release but have not been included in the integration branch are = also listed: maybe one of them could contribute to resolve a problem foun= d during the tests. And finally all redmine issues that have been marked = to be backported to giant but do not yet have a candidate pull request ar= e listed: this is the backport backlog so to speak ;-) Cheers --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --4xLF5XfOlBDFwkbesbdqIKP5BeMh7DFdA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlS35twACgkQ8dLMyEl6F23zXwCfRwEaLRwEStfGr61gQKCuDX1h fTsAoK75pL8hjDENHX1dxQwLdi7TBTkT =VQVa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4xLF5XfOlBDFwkbesbdqIKP5BeMh7DFdA--