From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: upcoming release giant v0.87.1 : leads feedback needed Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:03:27 +0100 Message-ID: <54B7F2DF.9060003@dachary.org> References: <54B7E6DC.8010905@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MeMJQxCcHBIqnHx73Ww8T6ATmLFxmBHOU" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:41135 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755354AbbAORD3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jan 2015 12:03:29 -0500 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA60742B25 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2015 18:03:27 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <54B7E6DC.8010905@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MeMJQxCcHBIqnHx73Ww8T6ATmLFxmBHOU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Again, Well, this is a little embarassing but here it is : there won't be a poin= t release for giant. I'll update the redmine tickets to remove the "giant= " backport targets as well as the github milestone list accordingly. Sorry for the noise. On 15/01/2015 17:12, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Ceph, >=20 > The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch was tested= with the rgw, rados and rbd suites. The results of each suite have been = analyzed and summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501. The next= steps are either: >=20 > a) Yehuda for rgw, Josh for rbd and Sam for rados all agree that the er= rors are unrelated to the backports > b) The https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-backports branch is give= n to QE for final tests and merge into giant >=20 > OR >=20 > a) At least of the lead thinks more work is needed to stabilize the gia= nt branch > b) A new set of tests will be run and analyzed after adding/removing on= e or more backports to/from the https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/giant-b= ackports branch >=20 > The description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501 shows a detaile= d list of all commits / issues that are in the giant backport branch. To = get a global view of what the next giant point release will be, the descr= iption also includes the commits that have already been merged in the gia= nt branch. The list of pull requests that are candidate for inclusion in = the giant release but have not been included in the integration branch ar= e also listed: maybe one of them could contribute to resolve a problem fo= und during the tests. And finally all redmine issues that have been marke= d to be backported to giant but do not yet have a candidate pull request = are listed: this is the backport backlog so to speak ;-) >=20 > Cheers >=20 --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --MeMJQxCcHBIqnHx73Ww8T6ATmLFxmBHOU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlS38t8ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F2266QCfYi9FHRvn6RNywVc3ye6h0CJ8 CvAAnjM0S+wTKhtBDdKov7ZQrLuNvp2s =kw8f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MeMJQxCcHBIqnHx73Ww8T6ATmLFxmBHOU--