diff for duplicates of <54B8DD44.1020402@de.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 73fb81a..c8e8e67 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Am 16.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Michael Ellerman: >> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For >> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such >> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step ->> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX145) +>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145) >> >> Change the ppc/kvm code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE. >> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Am 16.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Michael Ellerman: This bug was that gcc lost the volatile tag when propagating aggregates to scalar types. So in theory a union could be affected. See the original problem - ( http://marc.info/?iT611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) + ( http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) which happened on union ipte_control { @@ -44,3 +44,10 @@ union ipte_control { }; Christian + + +-- +To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in +the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, +see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . +Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ccea6f5..ea06274 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\01421363369.23332.8.camel@ellerman.id.au\0" "From\0Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/8] ppc/kvm: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE\0" - "Date\0Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:43:32 +0000\0" + "Date\0Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:43:32 +0100\0" "To\0Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>\0" "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" linux-arch@vger.kernel.org @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ ">> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For\n" ">> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such\n" ">> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step\n" - ">> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX145)\n" + ">> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)\n" ">>\n" ">> Change the ppc/kvm code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.\n" ">>\n" @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ "\n" "This bug was that gcc lost the volatile tag when propagating aggregates to scalar types.\n" "So in theory a union could be affected. See the original problem\n" - " ( http://marc.info/?iT611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) \n" + " ( http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) \n" "which happened on \n" "\n" "union ipte_control {\n" @@ -60,6 +60,13 @@ " };\n" "};\n" "\n" - Christian + "Christian\n" + "\n" + "\n" + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" + "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" + "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" + "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" -83490c8f0a3216d46232e1e0a7786b2d92e42f76fc8a644b18ac04766a0efd45 +53f2f89a4566aff96555a87df3f1f8d2e157d5b0466b6cd1de5ccb037340dfac
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 73fb81a..2782d6b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Am 16.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Michael Ellerman: >> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For >> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such >> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step ->> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX145) +>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145) >> >> Change the ppc/kvm code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE. >> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Am 16.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Michael Ellerman: This bug was that gcc lost the volatile tag when propagating aggregates to scalar types. So in theory a union could be affected. See the original problem - ( http://marc.info/?iT611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) + ( http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) which happened on union ipte_control { diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index ccea6f5..6a492f5 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ "ref\01421363369.23332.8.camel@ellerman.id.au\0" "From\0Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/8] ppc/kvm: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE\0" - "Date\0Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:43:32 +0000\0" + "Date\0Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:43:32 +0100\0" "To\0Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>\0" "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" linux-arch@vger.kernel.org @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ ">> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For\n" ">> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such\n" ">> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step\n" - ">> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX145)\n" + ">> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)\n" ">>\n" ">> Change the ppc/kvm code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.\n" ">>\n" @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ "\n" "This bug was that gcc lost the volatile tag when propagating aggregates to scalar types.\n" "So in theory a union could be affected. See the original problem\n" - " ( http://marc.info/?iT611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) \n" + " ( http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) \n" "which happened on \n" "\n" "union ipte_control {\n" @@ -62,4 +62,4 @@ "\n" Christian -83490c8f0a3216d46232e1e0a7786b2d92e42f76fc8a644b18ac04766a0efd45 +79d5980d9d091c3f44a30107e4337f5a4a121b5f8878a59d4e532abbd431f922
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index 73fb81a..2782d6b 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Am 16.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Michael Ellerman: >> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For >> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such >> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step ->> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX145) +>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145) >> >> Change the ppc/kvm code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE. >> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Am 16.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Michael Ellerman: This bug was that gcc lost the volatile tag when propagating aggregates to scalar types. So in theory a union could be affected. See the original problem - ( http://marc.info/?iT611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) + ( http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) which happened on union ipte_control { diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index ccea6f5..df1f4d5 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -3,16 +3,16 @@ "ref\01421363369.23332.8.camel@ellerman.id.au\0" "From\0Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 1/8] ppc/kvm: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE\0" - "Date\0Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:43:32 +0000\0" + "Date\0Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:43:32 +0100\0" "To\0Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>\0" - "Cc\0linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" - linux-arch@vger.kernel.org + "Cc\0linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" kvm@vger.kernel.org - kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org - linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org x86@kernel.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org + kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org + linux-mm@kvack.org xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org - " linux-mm@kvack.org\0" + " linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Am 16.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Michael Ellerman:\n" @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ ">> ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For\n" ">> example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such\n" ">> accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step\n" - ">> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX145)\n" + ">> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)\n" ">>\n" ">> Change the ppc/kvm code to replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE.\n" ">>\n" @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ "\n" "This bug was that gcc lost the volatile tag when propagating aggregates to scalar types.\n" "So in theory a union could be affected. See the original problem\n" - " ( http://marc.info/?iT611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) \n" + " ( http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com ) \n" "which happened on \n" "\n" "union ipte_control {\n" @@ -62,4 +62,4 @@ "\n" Christian -83490c8f0a3216d46232e1e0a7786b2d92e42f76fc8a644b18ac04766a0efd45 +2be3d354441e62dda8a28826f499084e3fb07615b419ebb3a1a335bce47a4f56
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.