From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: Re: ceph-qa analysis output Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:27:27 +0100 Message-ID: <54BAEFDF.50106@dachary.org> References: <54BA5E8D.30508@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="B1qD7R072heauwvIQhBDIfjm6L7LbvvXK" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:42579 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751562AbbAQX13 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:27:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Yuri Weinstein Cc: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --B1qD7R072heauwvIQhBDIfjm6L7LbvvXK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17/01/2015 23:08, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Hi Loic, >=20 > I'd love to. >=20 > Let's chat on Monday to finalize format. >=20 > ( > PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced= , e,g. >=20 > '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' > ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 > FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num Yes, as long as it's consistent enough to be machine readable, that works= :-) >=20 > PPS: Again this ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10455 would be > helpful in what we are discussing here. >=20 I'm not sure where the output of such a parsing would go. The update redm= ine API is currently broken (the read API works ok) but if it was fixed t= he tickets could be updated indeed. Cheers > Thx > YuriW >=20 > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:= >> Hi Yuri, >> >> It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readab= le. For instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read >> >> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 >> >> "FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)" >> >> (duplicate of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10430) >> >> which could be something like: >> >> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590': http://tracker.ceph.com/issues= /10543 FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num) >> >> or any other format you find easier to use consistently. >> >> The reason I ask is because it would help me write a script that assoc= iates redmine tickets to your findings, in the context of backporting. It= 's just an idea, not a request ;-) >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --B1qD7R072heauwvIQhBDIfjm6L7LbvvXK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlS6798ACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22cwgCgvojHHEbV/DJP8El3OHSMZJ3c 2NEAn0QHwdaIXuIHWmuF8wGyM8weJ2b8 =yv0f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --B1qD7R072heauwvIQhBDIfjm6L7LbvvXK--