From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hanjun Guo Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:46:35 +0800 Message-ID: <54BB56CB.7040701@linaro.org> References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1421247905-3749-7-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150116094913.GA13634@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54BB51F1.8000900@linaro.org> <508480149.12941388.1421562696311.JavaMail.zimbra@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:46272 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750880AbbARGqq (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:46:46 -0500 Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id et14so32378362pad.1 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:46:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <508480149.12941388.1421562696311.JavaMail.zimbra@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Masters Cc: Randy Dunlap , Arnd Bergmann , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Will Deacon , Olof Johansson , "wangyijing@huawei.com" , Robert Richter , Bjorn Helgaas , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "phoenix.liyi@huawei.com" , Rob Herring , grant.likel On 2015=E5=B9=B401=E6=9C=8818=E6=97=A5 14:31, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Sorry for top posting from bed. The mainstream servers will all likel= y do > PCIe but there are several that may not. They should not be excluded= =2E=20 That said, >if we booted a previously built kernel on a system without an MCFG an= d > got no ECAM/root then things would probably still work. > > I think it'll work out either way but for the record there is no requ= irement to do PCIe on ARM servers that conform to spec. OK, Catalin already said that was not the main point of the comments for this patch, I think the title and change log of the patch is inconsistent with the code makes Catalin confused, I will update them in next version. Thanks Hanjun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:46:35 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v7 06/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 In-Reply-To: <508480149.12941388.1421562696311.JavaMail.zimbra@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1421247905-3749-7-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150116094913.GA13634@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54BB51F1.8000900@linaro.org> <508480149.12941388.1421562696311.JavaMail.zimbra@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Message-ID: <54BB56CB.7040701@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2015?01?18? 14:31, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Sorry for top posting from bed. The mainstream servers will all likely do > PCIe but there are several that may not. They should not be excluded. That said, >if we booted a previously built kernel on a system without an MCFG and > got no ECAM/root then things would probably still work. > > I think it'll work out either way but for the record there is no requirement to do PCIe on ARM servers that conform to spec. OK, Catalin already said that was not the main point of the comments for this patch, I think the title and change log of the patch is inconsistent with the code makes Catalin confused, I will update them in next version. Thanks Hanjun From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752056AbbARGqt (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:46:49 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.220.41]:37411 "EHLO mail-pa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750760AbbARGqq (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:46:46 -0500 Message-ID: <54BB56CB.7040701@linaro.org> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:46:35 +0800 From: Hanjun Guo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Masters CC: Randy Dunlap , Arnd Bergmann , Charles Garcia-Tobin , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "graeme.gregory@linaro.org" , Will Deacon , Olof Johansson , "wangyijing@huawei.com" , Robert Richter , Bjorn Helgaas , Catalin Marinas , Marc Zyngier , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "phoenix.liyi@huawei.com" , Rob Herring , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Mark Brown , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , Mark Rutland , Timur Tabi , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Jason Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Make PCI optional for ACPI on ARM64 References: <1421247905-3749-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1421247905-3749-7-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <20150116094913.GA13634@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <54BB51F1.8000900@linaro.org> <508480149.12941388.1421562696311.JavaMail.zimbra@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <508480149.12941388.1421562696311.JavaMail.zimbra@zmail15.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2015年01月18日 14:31, Jon Masters wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Sorry for top posting from bed. The mainstream servers will all likely do > PCIe but there are several that may not. They should not be excluded. That said, >if we booted a previously built kernel on a system without an MCFG and > got no ECAM/root then things would probably still work. > > I think it'll work out either way but for the record there is no requirement to do PCIe on ARM servers that conform to spec. OK, Catalin already said that was not the main point of the comments for this patch, I think the title and change log of the patch is inconsistent with the code makes Catalin confused, I will update them in next version. Thanks Hanjun