* ceph-qa analysis output @ 2015-01-17 13:07 Loic Dachary 2015-01-17 22:08 ` Yuri Weinstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-17 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 776 bytes --] Hi Yuri, It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readable. For instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 "FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)" (duplicate of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10430) which could be something like: '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590': http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num) or any other format you find easier to use consistently. The reason I ask is because it would help me write a script that associates redmine tickets to your findings, in the context of backporting. It's just an idea, not a request ;-) Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph-qa analysis output 2015-01-17 13:07 ceph-qa analysis output Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-17 22:08 ` Yuri Weinstein 2015-01-17 23:27 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-17 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development Hi Loic, I'd love to. Let's chat on Monday to finalize format. ( PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced, e,g. '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num <jobs,...> <issue RE> <description> (this I suppose can be retrieved from tracker, a? if yes, we may not need it at all) ) Would it be possible to feed output of those machine digested emails (and hopefully others) into this doc - https://docs.google.com/a/inktank.com/spreadsheets/d/1S01gkuA149U5XSLStuzEoh-14tK2ICGm5tsCUomuzTo/edit#gid=403616374 (I granted you access as it's still under development/review) ? PPS: Again this ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10455 would be helpful in what we are discussing here. Thx YuriW On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > Hi Yuri, > > It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readable. For instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read > > '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 > > "FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)" > > (duplicate of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10430) > > which could be something like: > > '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590': http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num) > > or any other format you find easier to use consistently. > > The reason I ask is because it would help me write a script that associates redmine tickets to your findings, in the context of backporting. It's just an idea, not a request ;-) > > Cheers > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph-qa analysis output 2015-01-17 22:08 ` Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-17 23:27 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-18 0:27 ` Yuri Weinstein 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-17 23:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1722 bytes --] On 17/01/2015 23:08, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Hi Loic, > > I'd love to. > > Let's chat on Monday to finalize format. > > ( > PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced, e,g. > > '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' > ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 > FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num Yes, as long as it's consistent enough to be machine readable, that works :-) > > PPS: Again this ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10455 would be > helpful in what we are discussing here. > I'm not sure where the output of such a parsing would go. The update redmine API is currently broken (the read API works ok) but if it was fixed the tickets could be updated indeed. Cheers > Thx > YuriW > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> Hi Yuri, >> >> It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readable. For instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read >> >> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 >> >> "FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)" >> >> (duplicate of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10430) >> >> which could be something like: >> >> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590': http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num) >> >> or any other format you find easier to use consistently. >> >> The reason I ask is because it would help me write a script that associates redmine tickets to your findings, in the context of backporting. It's just an idea, not a request ;-) >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph-qa analysis output 2015-01-17 23:27 ` Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-18 0:27 ` Yuri Weinstein 2015-01-18 10:35 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-18 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development Sounds good, Loic Are you aware BTW about scrape tool written by John Spray? https://github.com/jcsp/scrape I use it for test runs analysis often. Just FYI Thx YuriW On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > > > On 17/01/2015 23:08, Yuri Weinstein wrote: >> Hi Loic, >> >> I'd love to. >> >> Let's chat on Monday to finalize format. >> >> ( >> PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced, e,g. >> >> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' >> ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 >> FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num > > Yes, as long as it's consistent enough to be machine readable, that works :-) > >> >> PPS: Again this ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10455 would be >> helpful in what we are discussing here. >> > > I'm not sure where the output of such a parsing would go. The update redmine API is currently broken (the read API works ok) but if it was fixed the tickets could be updated indeed. > > Cheers > >> Thx >> YuriW >> >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> Hi Yuri, >>> >>> It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readable. For instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read >>> >>> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 >>> >>> "FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)" >>> >>> (duplicate of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10430) >>> >>> which could be something like: >>> >>> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590': http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num) >>> >>> or any other format you find easier to use consistently. >>> >>> The reason I ask is because it would help me write a script that associates redmine tickets to your findings, in the context of backporting. It's just an idea, not a request ;-) >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ceph-qa analysis output 2015-01-18 0:27 ` Yuri Weinstein @ 2015-01-18 10:35 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2015-01-18 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yuri Weinstein; +Cc: Ceph Development [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2399 bytes --] Hi Yuri, I did not know about scrape. It looks extremely useful, thanks ! Do you have more magic items in your bag ? ;-) Cheers P.S. And thanks to John for writing scrape :-) On 18/01/2015 01:27, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Sounds good, Loic > > Are you aware BTW about scrape tool written by John Spray? > https://github.com/jcsp/scrape > > I use it for test runs analysis often. > > Just FYI > > Thx > YuriW > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> >> >> On 17/01/2015 23:08, Yuri Weinstein wrote: >>> Hi Loic, >>> >>> I'd love to. >>> >>> Let's chat on Monday to finalize format. >>> >>> ( >>> PS: I think format would be easier to maintain like new lines enforced, e,g. >>> >>> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' >>> ttp://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 >>> FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num >> >> Yes, as long as it's consistent enough to be machine readable, that works :-) >> >>> >>> PPS: Again this ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10455 would be >>> helpful in what we are discussing here. >>> >> >> I'm not sure where the output of such a parsing would go. The update redmine API is currently broken (the read API works ok) but if it was fixed the tickets could be updated indeed. >> >> Cheers >> >>> Thx >>> YuriW >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>> Hi Yuri, >>>> >>>> It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readable. For instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read >>>> >>>> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 >>>> >>>> "FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)" >>>> >>>> (duplicate of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10430) >>>> >>>> which could be something like: >>>> >>>> '701575', '701576', '701582', '701590': http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num) >>>> >>>> or any other format you find easier to use consistently. >>>> >>>> The reason I ask is because it would help me write a script that associates redmine tickets to your findings, in the context of backporting. It's just an idea, not a request ;-) >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-18 10:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-01-17 13:07 ceph-qa analysis output Loic Dachary 2015-01-17 22:08 ` Yuri Weinstein 2015-01-17 23:27 ` Loic Dachary 2015-01-18 0:27 ` Yuri Weinstein 2015-01-18 10:35 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.