From: Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <morgan.wang@huawei.com>, <josh@freedesktop.org>,
<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, <dzickus@redhat.com>,
<dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: RCU CPU stall console spews leads to soft lockup disabled is reasonable ?
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 16:07:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54BCBB33.6060608@huawei.com> (raw)
Hi,
On my x86_64 qemu virtual machine, RCU CPU stall console spews may
lead to soft lockup disabled.
If softlockup_thresh > rcu_cpu_stall_timeout (softlockup_thresh = 2 * watchdog_thresh):
/ #
/ # busybox cat /sys/module/rcupdate/parameters/rcu_cpu_stall_timeout
21
/ # echo 60 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh
/ # busybox insmod softlockup_test.ko
[ 44.959044] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=21002 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 44.959044] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 107.964045] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=84007 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 107.964045] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 170.969060] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=147012 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 170.969060] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 233.974057] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=210017 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 233.974057] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 296.979059] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=273022 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 296.979059] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 359.984058] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=336027 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 359.984058] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 422.989059] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=399032 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 422.989059] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 485.994056] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=462037 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 485.994056] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 548.999059] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=525042 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 548.999059] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 612.004061] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=588047 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 612.004061] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
[ 675.009058] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: {} (detected by 0, t=651052 jiffies, g=85, c=84, q=4)
[ 675.009058] INFO: Stall ended before state dump start
If softlockup_thresh < rcu_cpu_stall_timeout:
/ #
/ # busybox cat /sys/module/rcupdate/parameters/rcu_cpu_stall_timeout
21
/ # echo 5 > /proc/sys/kernel/watchdog_thresh
/ # busybox insmod softlockup_test.ko
[ 38.450061] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 52.450061] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 66.450073] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 80.450060] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
[ 94.450061] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 11s! [busybox:53]
The softlockup_test.ko source code is:
//
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
static int hello_start(void)
{
DEFINE_SPINLOCK(hello_lock);
spin_lock_init(&hello_lock);
spin_lock(&hello_lock);
spin_lock(&hello_lock);
return 0;
}
static int __init test_init(void)
{
hello_start();
printk(KERN_INFO "Module init\n");
return 0;
}
static void __exit test_exit(void)
{
printk(KERN_INFO "Module exit!\n");
}
module_init(test_init)
module_exit(test_exit)
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
//
My kernel version is v3.10.63, and i checked the kernel source code,
update_process_times
-> run_local_timers
-> hrtimer_run_queues
-> __run_hrtimer
-> watchdog_timer_fn
-> is_softlockup
-> rcu_check_callbacks
-> __rcu_pending
-> check_cpu_stall
-> print_cpu_stall
If softlockup_thresh > rcu_cpu_stall_timeout, print_cpu_stall will print log to serial port.
The 8250 serial driver will call serial8250_console_write => touch_nmi_watchdog() which reset
watchdog_touch_ts to 0. So the softlockup will not be triggered.
Is this reasonable? Why?
If it is not reasonable, we should adjust the printk loglevel from *KERN_ERR* to *KERN_INFO*
in print_cpu_stall.
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-19 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-19 8:07 Zhang Zhen [this message]
2015-01-19 8:42 ` RCU CPU stall console spews leads to soft lockup disabled is reasonable ? Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-19 9:04 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-19 11:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-20 3:17 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-20 3:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-19 14:06 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-20 3:09 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-20 15:25 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-21 2:26 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 3:13 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 6:54 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 7:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 7:25 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 9:05 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 10:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 11:11 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-21 20:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-21 15:10 ` Don Zickus
2015-01-21 20:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-01-22 3:08 ` Zhang Zhen
2015-01-22 5:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54BCBB33.6060608@huawei.com \
--to=zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=josh@freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=morgan.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.