From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] xen/domain: Introduce
 domain_max_vcpus() helper and implement per arch
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:52:18 +0000
Message-ID: <54BCFE02.4010106@citrix.com>
References: <1421666496-10676-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<1421666496-10676-2-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
	<54BCF5A2.5060500@eu.citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <54BCF5A2.5060500@eu.citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Simon Rowe <simon.rowe@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 19/01/15 12:16, Simon Rowe wrote:
> On 19/01/15 11:21, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> This allows the common XEN_DOMCTL_max_vcpus handler to loose some
>> x86-specific
>> architecture knowledge.
> Sp. "lose"
>>   +unsigned int domain_max_vcpus(const struct domain *d)
>> +{
>> +    return MAX_VIRT_CPUS;
>> +}
>> +
>>
>
> inline?
>
> Simon
>

I considered that but, while there is an asm-x86/domain.h, there is not
an asm-arm/domain.h which would be the logical location for it to live.

I can introduce an asm-arm/domain.h if the arm maintainers are happy.

~Andrew